photo MGBBanner2012.jpg

Archive for the ‘Opinion/Editorial’ Category

Ohio State Receives NCAA Punishment, But Was It Enough?

Wednesday, December 21st, 2011


[Ed.: Below is a reaction to Ohio State's NCAA sanctions from Tab Bamford, the man who was the first to break the Jim Tressel news almost exactly a year ago. On that day, he sent shockwaves throughout Columbus, eliciting direct denials from the school and Tressel himself, and started the ball rolling towards yesterday's sanctions. He was blasted on Columbus radio, received hate mail and personal threats from crazed fans, and became the state of Ohio's top trending topic on Twitter. And, oh yeah, he's a Michigan fan].

On Christmas Day, 2010, a blog post sent Columbus, Ohio into a frenzy. Someone outside the Buckeye Bubble had the nerve to receive credible information, and publish a report that said Ohio State head football coach Jim Tressel’s last game at OSU would be the Sugar Bowl.

OSU Athletic Director Gene Smith tweeted that day that Buckeye fans should “Go back to drinking your eggnog!! Rumors not true…”

OSU Sports Information Director Shelly Poe then allegedly texted media members in Columbus that the reports of Tressel’s impending departure were “the work of some prankster.”

These comments, coming from two of the highest-ranking individuals in the Ohio State Athletic Department, came on Dec. 25… or, according to later reports, 18 days after federal officers contacted the university to determine if items in question were stolen or simply sold for cash.

For over three months, Smith defended Tressel publically. In spite of self-reporting violations and taking steps to do the right thing, it was six months after the initial report that Tressel was actually gone from Ohio State. And yet, at the end of the day, the 2011 Sugar Bowl was indeed the final game Tressel coached at Ohio State.

The fall guy in all of this became Tressel, who was fired, fined, and cast away to the previously-unknown level of Dante’s inferno known as “the 2011 Indianapolis Colts.” He was fired by OSU, I mean he resigned on May 30, leaving behind a program will with suspended upper classmen, legal issues and a head coach that appeared to be finishing puberty.

Fast forward 360 days – an ironic, perfectly round number – and we’re back at square one. Smith was yet again answering for a systemic failure he continued to blame on Tressel.

The NCAA handed a one-year bowl ban and other minor, inconsequential penalties to the Buckeyes on Dec. 20. Smith said he was “surprised and disappointed” that the Buckeyes received such a punishment.

Tressel received a 5-year show cause order from the NCAA as part of the sanctions

My question, indeed my problem with this disappointment, is how the Buckeyes continue to get away with a naïve sense of entitlement in the face of serious issues.

In June 2010, USC was hit with a two-year bowl ban, four years’ probation, had to vacate 14 wins and the loss of 30 scholarships over a three-year period because Heisman Trophy-winner Reggie Bush and eventual NBA first round draft pick OJ Mayo took thousands of dollars from agents and supposed sports marketers.

Pete Carrol, who was then the head coach at USC, didn’t lie to the university or the NCAA; he left for the Seattle Seahawks.  The university was required to banish Bush from the program. USC was cited for a lack of institutional control and Bush gave back his Heisman.

But Tressel, who was absolutely wrong for being dishonest to the NCAA and OSU on multiple occasions, received more blind faith from his bosses than Carrol did from the Trojans’ athletic department.

Just a couple days before Tressel was encouraged to resign, USC’s appeal of their historic sanctions was denied by the NCAA. The hammer still dropped on Southern Cal, and yet now the Buckeyes are disappointed with receiving the quintessential slap on the wrist.

What is disappointing is that, in both cases, the head coach of a major program was a fraud. But in both cases, the lack of institutional control was laughable.

Ohio State’s idea of “institutional control” was forcing the players at the heart of the mess to come back to school for another season. If they had done the right thing, and immediately ended their collegiate careers, then the Buckeyes may have lost face – and recruits – in a nationally televised bowl game. So, in an effort to “do right by their student athletes” (read: athletic budget), Ohio State allowed those players to win them a bowl game before the program could use spring ball and summer practices to get players ready for prime time.

Meanwhile, all along, Smith defended his coach.

Did Ohio State deserve the same sentence USC received? Probably not. The prestige of the players involved at USC, including a Heisman Trophy winner, took the required penalty up a level for the Trojans.

But the separation between what OSU received and what USC was handed a year ago shouldn’t be so wide. The fact remains that Ohio State University knowingly used their power over student athletes for the financial gain of the university at the expense of credibility.

________________________________________________________________________________________

Tab Bamford writes the Daily Chicago Sports Tab for ChicagoNow.com, serves as a columnist and Chicago correspondent for TheFourthPeriod.com, and runs the wildly popular CommittedIndians.com, a Chicago Blackhawks blog. He is also the featured sports blogger for the Chicago Convention & Tourism Bureau and recently authored his first book, “100 Things Blackhawks Fans Should Know and Do Before They Die.”

Oh So Sweet: Michigan to Face Virginia Tech in Sugar Bowl

Monday, December 5th, 2011


Imagine how you felt at this time three years ago, watching the bowl selection show and knowing Michigan was staying home for the first time in nearly four decades. Then move forward a year and think about watching bowl season without your beloved Maize and Blue for the second straight year. Now advance to this time a year ago, finally being bowl eligible, but limping into the Gator Bowl on the heels of two blowout losses with a lame duck and beleaguered coach.

Now, imagine Bourbon Street and Cafe DuMonde, creole food and ragtag jazz musicians on every corner. But best of all, imagine Ryan Van Bergen and Mike Martin, Kevin Koger and David Molk, and the rest of Michigan’s seniors who chose to stay through three head coaches, multiple coordinators, and more scrutiny than any Michigan class in decades now going to a BCS bowl.

On Sunday night, Michigan was selected by the Sugar Bowl to face the Virginia Tech Hokies on January 3. It will be Michigan’s first BCS appearance since a Rose Bowl loss to USC at the end of the 2006 season and Michigan’s first ever matchup with Virginia Tech.

Michigan hasn’t won a BCS bowl since a 35-34 overtime win over Alabama in the 2000 Orange Bowl. Since then, Michigan has made a BCS bowl three times, all losses in the Rose Bowl, two to USC and one to Texas. Michigan has played in one Sugar Bowl previously (before the BCS existed), losing 9-7 to Auburn in 1984, and is 18-3 all-time against Atlantic Coast Conference opponents. Virginia Tech is 1-0 against Big Ten opponents and  1-2 in Sugar Bowls.

It creates an intriguing matchup two of the nation’s top ten defenses. The Hokies allow 17.2 points per game – identical to Michigan – and rank 12th nationally in total defense, giving up 313 yards per game. Offensively, the Hokies average 28.5 points per game and rank 31st in rush offense and 66th in pass offense. They do boast the nation’s seventh-best rusher, David Wilson, who averages 125 rushing yards per game, but Michigan has seen its share of talented running backs this season.

Neither team is very familiar with the other, having never played before. Virginia Tech head coach Frank Beamer, in his 25th season at the school, said he hasn’t seen much of Michigan but knows Denard Robinson can move.

Michigan coaches and players say likewise about the Hokies, but also talk about what this means for the program.

“It puts us back on the map, so to speak, as a national powerhouse,” said senior Ryan Van Bergen. “It will be great for recruiting, it will be great for the alumni and the fans, but the biggest thing for us: team 132 wants to play again. We’ve really grown close. We have great team chemistry, and the opportunity to play one more game on a stage as big as the Sugar Bowl is huge for us.”

More to follow on the matchup in the coming weeks.

________________________________________________________________________________________

In other BCS news, Alabama edged out Oklahoma State to get a spot in the BCS National Championship game against LSU, thus proving what we all already knew: the BCS system is terrible. The same system that denied Michigan a shot at a rematch against Ohio State in 2006 allowed Alabama a rematch against an LSU team that came into its own house and beat it a few weeks ago. If you don’t think there’s an SEC bias, you’re crazy.

Alabama beat Penn State and Auburn on the road and Arkansas at home. Aside from those three, the Crimson Tide didn’t beat a another FBS team that finished with a record above .500. So much for the “vaunted” SEC.

What about the team they held off? Oklahoma State recorded wins over four teams that finished in the BCS Top 25, including a 44-10 stomping of rival Oklahoma on Saturday, and averaged 49.3(!) points per game. Its only loss was in double-overtime at Iowa State. Seven of the Cowboys’ 11 wins were against teams that finished the season with winning records.

Alabama was given the spot in the BCS National Championship game, not because of the season-long results on the field (the overall body of work), but because of the perception that the SEC is be-all end-all in college football. Critics of some type of playoff or plus-one system should be locked away.

The worst part of it is that the system designed to choose the top two teams completely failed the number one team in the nation. LSU is far and away the best team in the nation this season. They’re the only undefeated team in the country, having beaten Pac-12 champion Oregon on a neutral field, Big East champion West Virginia on the road, Alabama on the road, and 10-3 Georgia on a neutral field.

LSU proved it can beat Alabama at Alabama. Why does it have to prove it again? If Alabama wins, who can anyone rightfully call them the better team? If we’re going to throw any other conference out of contention for this season’s national champion, one of two things should happen: LSU should be crowned national champion right now and Oklahoma State should face Alabama for #2, or Alabama should have to beat LSU twice to claim the crown since the Tide already lost to the Tigers once – in Tuscaloosa no less.

Yet it’s not a perfect system and the BCS relishes controversy and the TV ratings and dollars that come with it. And while the same system that got Alabama into the title game this year screwed Michigan out of it five years ago, Michigan was one of the beneficiaries of it this year. So we’ll enjoy our Sugar in New Orleans while our little siblings to the north are relegated to the Outback Bowl.

BCS Bubble Watch: A Michigan Fan’s Viewing Guide to Saturday

Friday, December 2nd, 2011


Michigan basketball fans have grown accustomed to sweating out Selection Sunday the past few years, anxiously awaiting whether the Wolverines would get a spot in the Big Dance or be left out. This weekend, Michigan football fans get their turn. While it’s not exactly the same – Michigan will still go to a good bowl regardless of what happens on Saturday – the outcome of Saturday’s conference championship games will determine whether Michigan plays in a prestigious BCS bowl or a typical New Year’s Day* bowl.

In all likelihood, only two of the following scenarios need to happen to get Michigan into the BCS (and most likely the Sugar Bowl), but why leave it up to chance? The more of these scenarios that happen, the better.

The winners of the six BCS conferences (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac 12, Big East, and ACC) earn automatic berths into the four BCS bowls (the Rose Bowl, Sugar Bowl, Fiesta Bowl, and Orange Bowl). If any of those happen to finish #1 or 2 in the final BCS standings, it will play in the BCS National Championship game, leaving a vacancy for an at-large.

An at-large selection must be ranked in the top 14 of the final BCS standings (teams from non-BCS conferences must be ranked in the top 12 or the top 16 if ranked higher than a BCS conference champion). Michigan currently stands at 16th with no games left to play, meaning the Wolverines have to leap frog two teams currently ranked ahead of them. Below is a list of Saturday’s games ranked in order of importance of what must happen for Michigan to make that jump.

For more on what needs to happen this Saturday, check out The Michigan Review’s breakdown.

1. SEC Championship: #1 LSU v. #14 Georgia (Line: LSU by 13.5)

This one is numero uno, since LSU and Alabama likely already have their spots in the BCS National Championship game secured. A Georgia win would give the Bulldogs the SEC’s automatic BCS bid and and knock Michigan out of contention for an at-large selection. At 10-2, Georgia is just two spots ahead of Michigan in the current rankings. A loss, even to the #1 team in the nation, would give the Bulldogs a third loss and drop them lower than Michigan. There’s an outside chance that a down-to-the-wire loss could keep Georgia ahead of Michigan, so root for Les Miles to help out his alma mater with a convincing victory.

Root for: A convincing victory by LSU

________________________________________________________________________________________

2. Big Ten Championship: #13 Michigan State v. #15 Wisconsin (Line: Wisconsin by 9.5)

This one is number two priority since regardless of who wins, one is bound to drop below Michigan. Wisconsin is #15 in the BCS and Michigan State is #13. The loser of this game would have a third loss and, therefore, likely drop below Michigan. MSU fans will argue that since they beat Michigan during the season, they deserve the BCS bid, but the reality is, they lost to Notre Dame and Nebraska and wouldn’t finish in the top 14 with a third loss. Wisconsin is just two hail marry’s away from a perfect season, but one was to 6-6 Ohio State. That, combined with a third loss, would pull the Badgers below 14th.

Like the LSU-Georgia game, an outside chance remains that an overtime game or a down-to-the-wire finish could keep the loser ahead of Michigan, so a lopsided win either way should be the goal.

Root for: A convincing win by one or the other. It really doesn’t matter who wins, but since we’re Michigan fans, keeping the Spartans from a Big Ten championship and a BCS bid would be ideal. Wisconsin convincingly.

________________________________________________________________________________________

3. Conference USA Championship: #6 Houston v. #24 Southern Miss (Line: Houston by 14)

Saturday TV Schedule
Time Game TV Root For:
12pm #24 Southern Miss at #6 Houston ABC
12:30pm Iowa State at #11 Kansas State
3:30pm #22 Texas at #17 Baylor ABC
4pm #14 Georgia v. #1 LSU CBS
8pm #10 Oklahoma at #3 Oklahoma State ABC
8pm #5 Virginia Tech v. #20 Clemson ESPN
8pm Fresno State at San Diego State
8:17pm #15 Wisconsin v. #13 Michigan State FOX
All times Eastern

The team everyone is forecasting Michigan to face in the Sugar Bowl, Houston, has turned in an impressive season. The Cougars have one of the most prolific offenses in the country led by senior quarterback Case Keenum. Had the Cougars compiled the type of season they did against BCS competition, they would be a shoe-in for the BCS National Championship game. However, the only team from a BCS conference that they played was the season-opener against UCLA (who finished 6-6) and Houston barely pulled out a 38-34 win.

A loss to Southern Miss would send the Cougars plummeting down the rankings, undoubtedly below Michigan, and freeing up a spot for the Wolverines in the BCS.

Root for: Southern Miss to pull off the upset, but it may also be a good game to watch to scout who could be Michigan’s Sugar Bowl opponent.

____________________________________________

4a. #17 Baylor v. #22 Texas (Line: Baylor by 3)

The Big 12 no longer has a conference championship game since it is down to 10 teams and no divisions, but it will factor heavily into who plays in the BCS. This game and the Oklahoma-Oklahoma State game could be interchangeable in terms of importance, but I see this one as slightly higher in importance. It won’t get Michigan into the BCS, but it could keep another team from jumping them.

Both teams are currently lower than Michigan, but Baylor is right on Michigan’s heels. Rightly or wrongly, the rankings view the Big 12 as a tougher conference than the Big 10 which explains why a three-loss Baylor squad is so close to a two-loss Michigan team. The fear here is another win over a Top 25 team would propel the Bears ahead of the stagnant Wolverines when the final rankings are released. The voters like the Bears with the Heisman Trophy candidate quarterback Robert Griffin III and if he turns in a captivating performance in a big win, it could be enough to leapfrog the Bears over Michigan.

Texas, at 7-4 and 22nd in the BCS standings, has no chance of surpassing Michigan, so a Longhorn win would keep Baylor from moving up. With Mack Brown’s rumored retirement on Saturday (to which Burnt Orange Nation says not so fast), Texas could play inspired ball.

Root for: A Texas win.

________________________________________________________________________________________

4b. #3 Oklahoma State v. #10 Oklahoma (Line: Oklahoma State by 3.5)

I ranked this with a slightly lower priority as the Baylor-Texas game because I think the probability of Baylor jumping Michigan with a big win is greater than Oklahoma falling below Michigan with a loss. The Sooners started the season ranked #1 in the nation and despite losses to Texas Tech and Baylor, have fallen only to 10th. The loss of top receiver Ryan Broyles a month ago really hurt the Sooners in their loss to Baylor.

An Oklahoma win would obviously keep the Sooners above Michigan in the rankings and Oklahoma State probably wouldn’t even drop out of the top 10, so that wouldn’t help. Really the only way this game could help Michigan is an Oklahoma State blowout.

Root for: An Oklahoma State blowout [Edit: this is assuming Oklahoma State does not jump Alabama for the #2 spot. I don't see it happening, but there may be enough voters out there who don't want a rematch that in this scenario, they will intentionally drop Alabama to try to secure Oklahoma State a spot in the BCS National Championship. Since this is an 8pm game, hopefully by this point in the night, Kansas State (and/or Baylor/Houston) and Georgia will have lost and then we can root for Oklahoma to avoid any chance of Oklahoma State passing Alabama]

________________________________________________________________________________________

5. Iowa State v. #11 Kansas State (Line: Kansas State by 11)

This game is unlikely, but still has a rooting interest. At 9-2, Kansas State is 11th in the current BCS rankings. The only losses for the Wildcats were in back-to-back weeks a 58-17 route to then-#9 Oklahoma and #3 Oklahoma State. In addition, the last two weeks have weeks have been near upsets. K State beat Texas A&M 53-50 in four overtimes and then beat Texas 17-13 two weeks ago. A loss to Iowa State would certainly drop the Wildcats below Michigan, and it’s not out of the question. Kansas State has played a number of close games this season: the two mentioned above, a 10-7 win over Eastern Kentucky, 28-24 over Miami, 36-35 over Baylor, and beat Missouri and Texas Tech by a touchdown each. This isn’t a team that has blown opponents away.

Iowa State isn’t good at 6-5, but the Cyclones did pull off a shocking double-overtime upset of then-#2 Oklahoma State two weeks ago, and also beat Iowa at the beginning of the season.

Root for: Iowa State to pull off the upset

________________________________________________________________________________________

6. ACC Championship: #5 Virginia Tech v. #20 Clemson (Line: Virginia Tech by 7)

This game is probably the least likely to factor into Michigan’s BCS hopes. Win or lose, Virginia Tech is solidly ahead of Michigan and Clemson is unlikely to jump the Wolverines. After climbing as high as #5 in the BCS standings a little over a month ago, the Tigers are reeling with three losses in their last four games. Even with a win tomorrow, against a Hokie team Clemson already beat, it will be a longshot for the Tigers to move all the way to 14th.

Root for: Virginia Tech or anything but a Clemson blowout.

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fresno State v. San Diego State (Line: San Diego State by 8)

This game has no official bearing on the BCS rankings, but since Michigan beat San Diego State, a win by the Aztecs may help give Michigan a few more percentage points. At this point, every point helps.

Root for: A San Diego State win.

________________________________________________________________________________________

Obviously, not all of these things are going to happen, but at least a couple of them need to. LSU beating Georgia is a must. From there, at least one of the others (two to be safe) would be great and we can look forward to watching Brady Hoke take Team 132 into Michigan’s first BCS bowl since the 2006 season.

*Since New Year’s Day falls on a Sunday this year, the NFL takes center stage, pushing the usual New Year’s Day bowl games to Monday, January 2.

Urban Warfare

Wednesday, November 30th, 2011


In the aftermath of the Jim Tressel saga back in March, I wrote that what happened to Ohio State wasn’t good for the rivalry. Obviously, a blatant disregard for the rules had to be punished and the dismissal of Tressel was the right thing to do, and further NCAA sanctions should be handed down. But the fact that our bitter rivals went on so long with such a culture of corruption, althewhile dominating the rivalry, tarnishes what happened on the field during that period.

Urban was named Ohio State head coach on Monday

The rivalry is at its best when it is as it’s always been: the best two teams in the Big Ten slugging it out at season’s end for the conference title and a trip to the Rose Bowl. Or even if both teams aren’t dominant, one having a realistic shot at ruining the other’s season with an upset.

As has been the case throughout the years, the teams are at their best when coached by a man who not only gets the rivalry, but has the personality to fuel it. For Ohio State, Tressel was that man. From the time he stepped foot on campus, he made it known that beating Michigan was the chief priority. That he was brash enough to exclaim it at halftime of a Buckeye basketball game endeared him to Buckeye faithful from the start.

When Tressel was forced out amid scandal in March, co-defensive coordinator Luke Fickell was thrust into the interim head coaching position. He may have been an up-and-comer, but he wasn’t ready for the job. His questionable coaching decisions (saving all three timeouts at the end of a still-winnable game against Miami) and general lack of polish (never seemed to give much focus on Michigan) painted the perception that he was in over his head and it did nothing to help the rivalry. In his defense, he was just a stop-gap to keep the seat warm until Tressel’s successor could be found. If he could pull off a good season, great; if not, he’s not the long term answer anyway.

Ohio State Athletic Director Gene Smith knew he had to make a big splash for Tressel’s replacement, not only to appease the salivating fanbase, but to perhaps save his own job. On Monday, that big splash, which was rumored over a week ago, hit like a tidal wave with the announcement of former Florida head coach Urban Meyer as the next head coach at Ohio State.

In many ways, the Tressel saga may have worked out to OSU’s benefit in the long run. While Tressel dominated the Big Ten, he routinely struggled in bowl games against SEC competition. Meyer should be able to recruit well enough nationally to fit with his spread offense and compete on a national scale. That is, if he can handle the return to the rigors of coaching – the reason he retired from Florida little more than a year ago.

As a Michigan fan, I hope he does. His prestige and previous success are a welcome addition to the rivalry and could be the final piece to another legendary string of Michigan-Ohio State battles.

Like Michigan Head Coach Brady Hoke, who got his first head coaching job at Ball State, Meyer started his career at Bowling Green (after serving as a tight ends and wide receivers coach at Ohio State from 1986-87). One may remember the last pair of UM-OSU head coaches who started off in the Mid-American Conference: Bo Schembechler and Woody Hayes.

Michigan is 1-0 against Urban, having beaten him 41-35 in the 2008 Capital One Bowl (photo from the Orlando Sentinel)

While the rivalry has always been strong, those two are widely credited with building it into what it is today. Their “Ten Year War” from 1969-78 was a brutal slugfest year-in and year-out, made personal by the fact that Bo had coached under Woody at Miami of Ohio. Because of that, Bo cemented beating Ohio as Michigan’s main goal each season, and Woody did likewise. That was handed down to Moeller and Carr, Cooper and Tressel before falling a little bit out of style under Rodriguez and Fickell.

Hoke took the Michigan job last January without even discussing a salary. As he said in his introductory press conference, “I promise you we would have walked to the University of Michigan.” He reaffirmed OSU’s position in Michigan’s minds from day one, referring to the Buckeyes simply as “Ohio,” and talking about them “a thousand times more” than Rodriguez did, according to center David Molk. The team ended every team meeting with “Beat Ohio.” It remains to be seen whether Meyer will follow suit, but he does have the Ohio State background, having served as an assistant coach there in the late 1980s.

Michigan has had success against Meyer, and having him in the scarlet and grey should be an interesting dynamic for as long as he resides in Columbus. In the 2008 Capital One Bowl, a 8-3 Michigan squad upended Meyer’s 9-2 Florida Gators, even with Heisman Trophy winner Tim Tebow at the helm. It was, ironically, a glorious sendoff for the retiring Lloyd Carr. In that game, Michigan piled up 524 yards of offense.

Another connection Michigan has with Meyer is defensive coordinator Greg Mattison, who was Meyer’s DC in 2005-07 before leaving for the same position with the Baltimore Ravens. Mattison helped Florida attain the nation’s 9th-best defense in 2005, 6th in 2006, and 41st in 2007. His defense also captured the 2006 National Championship. The argument can be a two-way street, as to who has the advantage; Mattison for knowing Meyer’s offensive gameplan or Meyer for knowing Mattison’s defensive schemes. But regardless, an advantage Michigan does have in that respect is Mattison’s recruiting prowess. It was Meyer who said of Mattison, “He’s not only one of the best defensive coordinators in America, but also the best recruiter in college football.”

Meyer’s name will certainly help Ohio State land top recruits, especially in the talent-rich state of Florida, but it shouldn’t take much of a chunk out of Michigan’s recruiting pie. The combination of Hoke’s major focus on the state of Ohio and Mattison’s ability to sell recruits especially on the defensive side of the ball, contrasted with Meyer’s national prestige should help get both Michigan and Ohio State back to their rightful spot at the top of the Big Ten.

So as Michigan fans, let’s welcome Meyer to Ohio State and prepare for another exciting period of college football’s greatest rivalry. And in doing so, we will carry momentum into Columbus next November and welcome him to the Big Ten in style.

The Rear View Mirror Makes a Case for Denard

Monday, October 24th, 2011


It’s no secret that Denard Robinson had a bad game against Michigan State on Saturday or that his passing has not shown much improvement since last season. He went 9-for-24 last Saturday, lowering his season completion rate to 53.9 percent, and threw an interception to raise his season total to a nation-leading 11. Michigan fans across the spectrum are clamoring for Devin Gardner to replace him. So why is this guy still the starting quarterback at Michigan?

Denard already ranks in the top 10 in every passing and rushing category (photo by the Ann Arbor News)

The answer, in short, is because by the time he hangs up his jersey for the last time, Denard will be one of the greatest quarterbacks to ever don the maize and blue. You may scoff at that claim, given the number of signal-callers Michigan has sent to the NFL, but it depends on what your definition of quarterback is.

Is he the best pure, NFL-ready quarterback? No. There are probably a dozen Michigan alums that were better true pro-style quarterbacks. But college football is chalk full of effective quarterbacks who aren’t NFL-style QBs. Denard is one of the best, and the same can be said for his place in the history of college football’s all-time winningest program.

Don’t agree? Look at the numbers. He’s a year-and-a-half into his career as a starter and he already ranks in the top 10 in nearly every major offensive category, both passing and rushing.

Michigan has fielded 132 teams since the football program began in 1879. It has a history as rich as any school in the country. There have been some phenomenal players to take the field, but none have the statistical resume Robinson will have when he graduates.

Putting stats aside for a minute, the main metrics in which any player is judged – and rightfully so – are winning games, winning championships, and beating rivals. Right now, Denard trails in all three, but he’s not as far behind the greats as one would think.

He has a current record of 13-7 as a starting quarterback through his first 20 games. By contrast, Chad Henne and John Navarre were each 14-6, and Tom Brady and Elvis Grbac were 15-5. Brian Griese was 16-4 thanks to the national championship season of 1997, and Jim Harbaugh was 16-3-1. As you can see, Denard’s not far behind the recent greats in the win category. However, judging a quarterback by winning games alone is somewhat misleading unless you look at the talent he has around him.

Henne had probably the best crop of playmakers of any Michigan quarterback, with Braylon Edwards, Steve Breaston, Mario Manningham, and Adrian Arrington to throw to, Mike Hart to hand off to, and an NFL No. 1 overall pick, Jake Long, protecting him. Navarre had David Terrelle and Marquise Walker to throw to and Anthony Thomas and Chris Perry to hand off to. Griese had Amani Toomer, Tim Biakabatuka, Tai Streets, an NFL offensive line, and one of the greatest defenses of all time. Grbac had Desmond Howard, Derrick Alexander, and Ricky Powers.

Denard has some talent around him, but right now it pales in comparison to what Henne, Navarre, Griese, and Grbac had. Every single one of those above played or are playing in the NFL. How many of Denard’s current supporting cast will make it to the league?

Chad Henne is Michigan's career leader in all major passing categories, but had a losing record against rivals (photo by the Ann Arbor News)

Now that we’ve established that Denard is right on pace in the win category, lets move on to winning championships. If we’re talking national championships, then only Brian Griese can count in the modern era. We would have to go all the way back to Pete Elliott in 1948 to find the last Michigan quarterback to lay claim to that.

If we’re talking Big Ten championships, then Denard has some work to do. Henne started four years but won just one Big Ten title. Denard still has a chance –albeit slight – to achieve that this season. He also has a year left. Brady, Griese, and Harbaugh each also won one. Navarre won two, although one was in 2000 when he started just four games and split time with Drew Henson.

How about beating rivals? This has a chance to be Denard’s strongest comparison but just like winning games, this takes help. He has beaten Notre Dame both times he’s faced them – and did it almost singlehandedly each time. He’s lost twice to Michigan State and is 0-1 against Ohio State with a chance to even that record at the end of November. That would pull him to 3-3 against rivals, and with a sweep in 2012, he could get to 6-3. But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Since he will play nine career rivalry games, barring injury, he’ll either finish with a winning or losing record in those games.

Henne went 5-6 (4-0 against Michigan State, 1-2 against Notre Dame, but 0-4 against Ohio State). Navarre went 4-4 (2-1 against Michigan State, 1-1 against Notre Dame, and 1-2 against Ohio State). Griese was 4-1 (2-0 against Ohio State, 1-0 against Notre Dame, and 0-1 against Michigan State). Grbac was 5-2-1 (2-0 against Ohio State, 2-1 against Michigan State, and 1-2-1 against Notre Dame). Harbaugh went 6-1 (2-0 against both Ohio State and Notre Dame, and 2-1 against Michigan State).

So by that measure, Harbaugh, Grbac, and Griese lead, but again, Denard still has a chance to achieve a winning record, which Henne and Navarre couldn’t. Only Henne had a losing record, so Denard will have to avoid doing that.

Stats-wise, Denard currently ranks 9th in career completions (272), 10th in passing yards (4,011), 9th in touchdown passes (31), 9th in 100-yard passing games (14), and 6th in 200-yard passing games (9). He also has the second-best single-game completion percentage, with his 86.3 percent performance against UConn last season, he currently ranks 5th in career completion percentage (59.9), just ahead of Henne, and 4th in career efficiency rating (145.9), ahead of both Henne and Brady. Last season’s 2,570 passing yards was the 7th-best season total in Michigan history.

By the time his career is over, Denard should conceivably rank third or fourth in every major passing category, behind only Henne and Navarre.

Rushing-wise, he’s like no other Michigan has seen. Michigan has had some agile quarterbacks, but none put up anywhere close to the rushing numbers he has so far, partially because they all had solid running backs alongside them. Denard is already second in Big Ten history for quarterback rushing yards, trailing only Illinois’ Juice Williams, and he’s just 1,080 away from passing Williams.

He currently ranks 10th in Michigan career rushing yards (2,815) and career rushing touchdowns (28). Those numbers are for any Michigan player, not just quarterbacks. He also has the highest career yards-per carry average (6.49), the 4th-best single season yardage total (1,702), and the 5th-best single game total (258). Last week, he passed Tim Biakabatuka in yards. By the time his career is over, he’ll likely rank in the top four in yards and top two or three in touchdowns.

So buckle up Michigan fans, because right now we’re witnessing one of the most prolific Michigan quarterbacks of all time, whether you like his style or not. After he graduates, Michigan will likely go back to the NFL-style signal-caller, and years from now, we’ll all look back with reverence at the Michigan legend that was Denard Robinson. Let’s put to rest the calls for Gardner.

Agree to Disagree

Thursday, September 15th, 2011


Since my previous article was posted on Monday, I saw that some other sites have taken exception to my suggestion that the Michigan coaching staff do what it can to better take advantage of Denard Robinson’s skill set.  For those that don’t remember, I pointed out that I believed that the Michigan offense would run smoother and be more effective if Robinson was allowed to use his feet to create more options on the field.  It seems that some other sites took this to mean that I was yearning again for the days of Rich Rod when all we saw was Robinson in the Shotgun running the zone read, often keeping the ball himself and creating plays.  As we all know, this led to a significant loss of playing time, as Robinson’s frame could not take the pounding of playing a 12 (13 with bowl)-game schedule, eight of which are in the physical Big Ten.

To the contrary, my suggestion was that Hoke and Co. continue to run the offense the way that it is, however, change the way in which they pass the ball.  Robinson can throw the ball for sure, but is he best-suited to be a drop back passer?!  NO.  Does that mean he should be used as a running back instead of as a quarterback??  NO.

Denard is more effective when out of the pocket

It is possible to have an effective passing game that doesn’t involve a 5- or 7-step drop.  It’s called roll outs and play-action!  That’s where he can really be effective because if the receivers are covered, he still has the ability to use his feet to make a play.

Every week, opposing defenses are going to key on Robinson, saying that they will not lose because of what Robinson does on the field.  They are going to make someone else beat them.  By keeping him in the pocket to “make” him a pocket passer, you’re playing right into their hands.  That’s where the D wants to keep him!  Get him on the outside where not only does he have the ability to do what he does best and create plays, but he also doesn’t have to deal with the pressure of a defensive front seven closing in on him.

The key to all of this is keeping him healthy of course, and this can be done.  Maybe Borges coaches him up to be a little smarter when he tucks the ball and runs.  Or talk to him about getting what yards he can and then stepping out of bounds.  Or maybe not taking a hit head-on and instead protecting himself by deflecting the blow.  If you don’t think that’s possible, it is.  I’ve done it.  And no, it doesn’t make him look weak.  What would you rather have?  An extra three yards and Denard out with a concussion or have him avoid the big hit and help the team by staying on the field?  The choice should be easy.

Yes, maybe Denard was a little keyed up for the game.  But being keyed up for the game doesn’t last for three quarters, and generally not even one quarter.  Eventually all QBs settle down and get into the flow of the game, especially competitors like Denard Robinson.  Even if this was the case, why force him to do something that he’s clearly not comfortable doing, like dropping back in the pocket to pass?  Can he do it?  YES.  Has he gotten better at it?  YES.  Is it really the best option for him and for the Michigan offense?  I think not.

All season, Michigan is going to be forced to win with Robinson’s arm.  Opposing teams will stack the line to force Michigan to throw the ball to win.  Against better defenses (Wisconsin, Michigan State, Nebraska, that school down south) those jump balls that Robinson threw are not going to go Michigan’s way.  Not only that, but those secondaries won’t blow coverages like ND’s did.  Robinson getting out of the pocket will allow for a more efficient passing game instead of “throw it up and hope we come down with it.”  Once that opens up, defenses back off, and then you can run the ball again.  And not just in the spread with the zone read, but from the I-formation.  This creates a true balanced attack which I think will make Michigan even better.

When Maize and Blue Meets Crimson and Cream

Sunday, September 4th, 2011


As a Michigan Man, I’m familiar with game days in Ann Arbor and I’ve been to my share of Ohio State games, having grown up in Ohio. I’ve also been to Michigan games at every Big Ten stadium except Minnesota, and I’ve attended college football games at Kentucky, Missouri, Texas, and USC (among other smaller FBS schools).

Yesterday, my job took me to Norman, Oklahoma, where I got my first taste of Sooner football, and I was both impressed and not impressed.

I got to campus at noon for the 7pm game in order to knock out my work duties for the day. At that point, tailgating was just getting started. At 2pm, I ventured across campus to the Campus Corner area which houses all the bars and restaurants. On game days, this area has a street festival-like atmosphere with the roads closed and lined with vendors.

The OU Game Day at Campus Corner area

I had to find somewhere to watch the Michigan game and O’Connell’s (which is where the big Boomer sign is in the above photo) was recommended. However, it was packed, had no space at the bar, and a long wait for a table, so I ventured on in search of the perfect place.

While walking through, I passed a few other Michigan fans decked out in maize and blue garb and gave each other a hearty “Go Blue!” A security guard stopped me and asked, “What’s with all the Michigan fans around here today?” He said he had never seen so many in Norman.

A couple blocks away, I found a gastropub called Blackbird’s which ended up being a great place to watch the game. They had four or five house-brewed beers and a solid gameday menu selection, not to mention plenty of big screen TVs throughout. The best part was it was fairly low-key and not overcrowded so I was able to have the bartender turn the sound on to the game.

I watched until the first rain delay and then had to trek back towards the stadium to finish my work duties. By this time, campus was much more crowded with Sooner fans and tailgating was in full swing. One thing I noticed throughout the day was the tailgating was a much more relaxed atmosphere than what I’m used to seeing at Michigan and other Big Ten games. Instead of a party atmosphere, OU fans were mostly just sitting around watching other games on their flat screen TVs fed by satellite dishes, playing cornhole, and talking.

The Sooner Schooner in front of the stadium before the game

The ticket I scored was a student ticket, which was general admission. Because of my work responsibilities, I wasn’t able to get in the gates until game time, and by then, there were long lines to get into the general admission sections. When I finally got to the ramp to start walking up to the sections, there were two guards checking student IDs. Obviously, I didn’t have one, and was decked out in maize and blue, but I told them I was a Michigan fan eager to check out a game at OU and they let me through.

I found a seat (actually, a spot to stand) near the top of the section at about the 20-yard line. It was a great vantage point to take in the pageantry of Sooner football. Unfortunately, and to my surprise, there wasn’t a whole lot. The in-game atmosphere was nothing compared to the Big House. The crowd wasn’t very loud (although the stadium may have something to do with that, being open on the ends). The in-game music was about half marching band and half piped-in rock music which always assaulted your eardrums right when it started.

The students as a whole were generally disinterested in the game. Of course, at every college stadium, you have your share of students who get tickets just for the sake of getting tickets and only care to make an appearance at the game and leave during the second quarter, but this seemed to be the sentiment amongst many of the OU student section. It’s as if they care more about looking good than cheering on their Sooners.

Game day attire was short dresses and cowboy boots for the girls and polos, visors, and sunglasses with neck cords for the guys. I saw very few OU jerseys being worn, which is what you see in the Big House and other Big Ten stadiums.

Yes, it was against Tulsa and wasn’t very competitive after the first couple of drives, but I’ve been to my share of Michigan games against the Ball States and the Eastern Michigans of the world to know the difference. I can best describe the in-game atmosphere of an Oklahoma game as an Indiana or Northwestern game with guns and horses. After each score, shotguns were fired off behind the endzone and fireworks were shot up from the scoreboard. After the extra point, the Sooner Schooner took a spin around half the field and that’s about it.

While I was disappointed with the actual game atmosphere, I was impressed with the class and genuine niceness of the Sooner fanbase. In the approximately 11 hours I spent on campus wearing a Michigan shirt, I was never once heckled. I didn’t hear a single “Michigan sucks” or “Muck Fichigan.” What I did hear was Sooner fans asking me how I think Michigan will do this year and telling me that they hope Michigan returns to being great again because it’s good for college football. You don’t usually get that from other fanbases.

I’m sure they’re a bit different when Texas or Oklahoma State is in town, but I was thoroughly impressed with the courtesy I was shown as an opposing fan in their home.

If you get the chance, I would recommend catching a game in Norman sometime. I’d pick a bigger game than OU-Tulsa if possible to at least make the in-game experience more enjoyable, but you will have a good time.

Kickoff after an OU touchdown

Michigan Gets it Right With Retro Jerseys

Saturday, June 11th, 2011


Tonight’s unveiling of Michigan’s retro jersey for the Under the Lights Game against Notre Dame on Sept. 10 should excite the Michiagn fanbase as we move on from the past three seasons and into what is shaping up to be an exciting season.

Previously released renderings of the jerseys, even from earlier today, were met with a great deal of angst and disparagement from much of the maize and blue faithful, but the final versions modeled by Denard Robinson and Ryan Van Bergen at tonight’s ceremony should be celebrated.

The uniforms that Michigan unveiled live on MGoBlue.com are certainly differant than Michigan’s traditional solid blue top, but by no means should that be a bad thing.

Michigan’s uniforms are defined by tradition. Similar to Penn State and perhaps Texas, simplicity has made them one of the most iconic in college football.

Other schools that don’t have the history and tradition of the nation’s winningest program, such as Oregon or TCU have gone the gimmicky route full time, even changing styles and designs every few seasons. The addition of Nike’s Pro Combat took it a step further, eschewing tradition for snazzy, money-making get-ups like Florida’s, Arizona State’s, and a bunch of others.

While those uniform designs likely appeal to younger fans, Michigan’s night game duds should encompass the whole spectrum of Michigan fans by tying in the entire history of the Michigan uniform.

“Michigan’s maize and blue jersey is one of the most iconic in all of sports and this new vintage-inspired uniform highlights design cues from throughout Michigan’s rich football tradition honoring 132 years of championship football,” said Jon Yuska, Adidas’ director of sports licensing design.

Because of the lack of significant uniform changes over the course of the 132-year history of Michigan football, especially in the modern era, there weren’t many options to choose from when designing throwbacks to commemorate the game. Aside from changing from Adidas to whoever made the jerseys back in the day, and some minor number or font tweaks, actual throwbacks would look basically the same as what Michigan always wears on Saturdays.

Michigan's 1895 team uniforms

Since creating a true throwback was not really an option, Michigan AD Dave Brandon and the Adidas design team chose to take elements and concepts from the past 132 years and develop a unique uniform that personifies the program’s rich history.

From Michigan’s first captain, David N. DeTar, in 1879, to Bennie Oosterbaan in the 20s to Gerald Ford and Tom Harmon in the 30s, all the way to the stars of the modern era who never got to play under the lights in Ann Arbor, these uniforms represent 132 years of Michigan football.

September 10 deserves to be celebrated, not just for the 85 who get to suit up that day, but for the thousands whose combined efforts have made Michigan football the nation’s best. Tweaking the uniforms ever so slightly to honor one team from the 40s is great, but if that’s to be done, there will be a time and a place for that. This game is about more than one team or one era since it’s carving history out of what is already the sport’s most historic program.

These retro uniforms involve elements from the very beginnings of Michigan football in the late 1800s that wore the block M on the front as well as the striping on the sleeves (if you don’t like that, at least it’s not the full uniform like the Where’s Waldo uniforms some players wore in 1888). It also features the number on the sides of the winged helmets, as Michigan wore in the 1950s and 60s, as well as grey facemasks. Aside from those elements, Michigan’s uniforms really haven’t changed in the modern era.

I commend Brandon and the Adidas design team for integrating several elements of Michigan’s uniform history to create a compelling uniform for this historical occasion. It’s not something I would buy to wear, but I’d probably buy one to hang in a Michigan-themed man cave.

Most importantly, the team seems to love them and they’re only for one game,  so we don’t have to worry about Michigan’s history being thrown out the window. There’s nothing wrong with a little marketing gimick now and then, especially when it gets everybody talking about Michigan football again in a positive light while we watch that school in Ohio’s world crumble more and more each day.

Share this post

What Comes Around…

Wednesday, June 1st, 2011


When Jim Tressel announced his resignation yesterday, it seemed fitting that the man who constantly spoke out in support of American’s troops chose Memorial Day of all days to resign, thus ending his 10-year reign as one of the best coaches in the nation.

For the past two-plus months since the original Yahoo story was released detailing the cover-up, it seemed as if Tressel was going to fight this thing to the end, refusing to admit wrongdoing or take responsibility. And as such, Buckeye fans have taken to denying his transgressions, defending his standing as a legend, and personifying the “win-at-all-costs” mentality.

Some of the statements I have seen from my Ohio State acquaintances include: “Tressel is a legend & he will be missed at OSU” and “Regardless of what happens with Coach Tressel, and I certainly hope he gets through all of the crap they’re piling on top of him, Ohio State will still beat Michigan.”

That Buckeye Nation is in denial only stands to show just how sad this situation is. As long as you outwardly portray your good deeds, tout your religion, say all the same tired “senatorial” lines, and beat Michigan, you can do whatever you want, flaunt the rules, and claim ignorance, and you’ll go down as a martyr in Columbus.

While George Dohrmann’s Sports Illustrated article that was release last night didn’t drop any further bombshells, it added further substance to the previously known allegations, which will likely make it impossible for the NCAA not to find Ohio State guilty of “failing to monitor.”

It described in more detail Tressel’s turning a blind eye to rules violations while at Youngstown State and even the way he cheated high school kids out of camp raffles as an OSU assistant in the 80s. It also brought to light a dozen more football players on the take over the past eight years.

If Tressel has been cheating his entire coaching career, not just an isolated incident involving a few bad apples as Ohio State spun it back in December, it begs the question of how good a coach he actually is.

Former Buckeye Brian Rolle posted to his Twitter account today, “Since when did ‘receiving extra benefits’ have anything to do with a 106-22 record,what 6 straight against them whores up north #DontFlagOut.”

True, Tressel was 9-1 against Michigan during his career, and the results on the field speak for themselves. But what kind of advantage did Tressel gain from his transgressions? To impressionable 17-and-18-year old high school kids, many of whom come from rough neighborhoods and broken families, one school offering car deals, free tattoos, money handshakes, drugs, and help with getting out of traffic tickets, sounds a lot more appealing than another school offering just an education and a chance to play football.

If those extra benefits of playing for Ohio State are used as a recruiting tactic, either by the coaches or by the players during official visits, and it can sway just a couple of top recruits per class, that’s a decided advantage over schools that play by the rules.

"Here Terrelle, I filled it with some of that Hennessy stuff you like so much."

Tressel was able to get away with it for so long by playing the sweater-vested, bespectacled, politically correct saint. His hospital visits, charity work, and support of the troops are all great things. But if he used those things, consciously or subconsciously, to shield his unsavory behind the scenes work, he’s no better than any other coach who was caught cheating or any priest who was caught abusing children.

I make that comparison, not because I think what Tressel has done over the past two-plus decades is anywhere near as filthy and vile as that, but in a sense, he was taking advantage of kids. For his benefit. For the benefit of winning games and Big Ten championships and beating Michigan.

Sure, the players got to participate. Those in the early 2000s got to be part of a national championship team, and several classes got to lay claim to being undefeated in their careers against Michigan. Some, and probably the majority, will cherish those memories as they move on to life after football. But others, the ones who were really taken advantage of, found a hollowness in those trophies, rings, and golden pants. They weren’t prized possessions full of significance. They were a means to an end – an end, which just like the ink that will always stain their arms, will leave lasting scars on their college experience.

To many a Buckeye fan, Tressel was seen as  role model for kids, a mentor helping bridge the gap between childhood and adulthood for many who lacked significant father figures in their lives. But what did those kids really learn? On one hand, their coach was taking them to visit sick children in hospitals, but on the other hand, he was letting them get impermissible car deals, cash, drugs, and more. Instead of learning right from wrong or being punished for their mistakes, they were taught that winning games and beating Michigan were more important than playing by the rules.

Perhaps the mentality of today’s youth is partially to blame. In an era of Facebook and YouTube, Twitter and FourSquare, over-hyped commitment press conferences, and recruiting rankings that seemingly start at birth, playing for school pride and gaining an education is no longer enough. Making money, driving the sweetest rides, and smoking weed have become symbols of entitlement for many athletes. The problem is, these players don’t realize that if they work hard for two or three years, they can have all of that stuff legally when they become pros. They need role models to help them understand that. Of course, it should start with the parents, but many times these kids don’t have that, and the responsibility falls on the coaches. A true coach of character and integrity wouldn’t recruit those kids in the first place, but certainly would make sure they’re getting the best education possible, both in the classroom and in life. A coach’s job, more than just winning games, is to provide leadership, accountability, and an example of character and integrity, not just write about them.

Upon being hired by Ohio State in 2001, Tressel stood at mid court at halftime of an Ohio State basketball game and stated, “I can assure you that you will be proud of your young people in the classroom, in the community, and most especially in 310 days in Ann Arbor, Michigan, on the football field.”And that’s where Tressel failed. He lived up to the “on the football field” part, but failed in the other aspects, and that’s the sad part about this whole thing.

The NCAA investigation will go on for the coming months and eventually sanctions will be imposed on the Ohio State football program. What those sanctions are is yet to be determined, but current players and incoming recruits will be affected, and former players’ careers tainted, whether they participated in the shenanigans or not. But hopefully everyone learns a valuable lesson from all of this: no matter how good your perceived reputation is, the truth will always come out and cheaters never win.

He Is Who We Thought He Was

Thursday, March 10th, 2011


It’s never a good thing when your rival goes down in flames. We may root for them to lose every now and then (okay, or more times than not). We may be glad when they lose out on a top recruit. But when their coach is outed for NCAA violations, we shouldn’t rejoice, right? Yet, in the aftermath of Tuesday’s bombshell dropped by Yahoo that Ohio State Head Coach Jim Tressel was made aware of NCAA violations regarding some current players and did nothing with it, I’m met with mixed emotions.

On one hand, it’s bad for the rivalry and bad for the Big Ten Conference as a whole, but on the other hand, it’s been a long time coming.

For the past decade, college football fans that don’t see the world through scarlet and grey lenses have known something just wasn’t right with the guy. The writing was on the wall, if only with laundry detergent* instead of Sharpie. He’s been deified by those in Buckeye Nation as a supreme bastion of integrity, but there’s a reason others dubbed him “Teflon Tressel.” Even though the number of violations involving high-profile players that have occurred under his watch could rival those of any other coach in the country, he always maintained a pristine reputation. Until Tuesday.

Yahoo’s piece by Charles Robinson and Dan Wetzel finally revealed enough to perhaps permanently tarnish that reputation. And he didn’t make it any better with the spin job he put on during last night’s televised press conference.

Most expected him to admit wrongdoing, apologize for it, and take his medicine. Instead, he admitted wrongdoing, said he has a tendency to talk in circles, and then talked in circles.

If you haven’t read the emails that form the backbone of this revelation, his explanations probably seemed at least somewhat understandable. He received a startling email from an attorney hinting at involvement of some of his players with the subject of a federal drug trafficking investigation, was so scared and concerned that he didn’t know what to do, decided he didn’t want to break confidentiality and interfere with a federal investigation, so he did nothing. Except that wasn’t actually his reaction.

“Thanks [name redacted]…I will get on it ASAP…Happy Easter to you as well !! Go Bucks !! jt” read his reply to the initial email on April 2.

I’m no expert on email lingo of middle-aged football coaches, but common sense tells me that when you’re truly “scared” and “concerned” about the contents of an email, your reply wouldn’t include multiple exclamation points, and “Go Bucks.”

His reply suggests a “buddy-buddy” relationship with the attorney, a “thanks for giving me the heads up before anybody else found out” reaction.

(AP Photo)

Nowhere in the initial conversation did the word confidential appear, nor was it hinted at. In fact, the attorney said “Just passing this on to you,” which indicates it wasn’t intended to be confidential.

Two weeks passed before the attorney emailed Tressel back with more detailed information and stated that the information was confidential. Tressel had two weeks before confidentiality was requested to report it to somebody (I mean, he did say “I will get on it ASAP”), but as he said in last night’s press conference, “In my mind, I couldn’t think of who that best to be.”

Huh?

You received information which at that point wasn’t confidential, that some of your current players were engaging in what you knew were NCAA violations and you couldn’t think of who to report it to? Seriously? This coming from the coach of a program that has self-reported more minor violations than any other school in the nation the past 10 years ?

His next response was even more puzzling.

“I hear you !! It is unbelievable !! Thanks for your help…keep me posted as to what I need to do if anything. I will keep pounding these kids hoping they grow up…jt”

When thinking of who he could possibly report this to, his boss, school compliance officials, or even the university’s attorney apparently didn’t come to mind, but he asked the attorney who sent these emails to keep him posted as to what he needed to do if anything. Since when does Jim Tressel, head football coach at The Ohio State University, report to this attorney, and why is his take-away action-item that he’s going to “keep pounding these kids until they grow up”?

If he was concerned about the confidentiality of a federal investigation and not compromising the well-being of his involved players, it seems like an appropriate response would be something along the lines of “Look Mr. Attorney, I realize this is confidential, but I’m bound by contract to report any possible NCAA violations to my superiors and ultimately to the NCAA. Would my doing so jeopardize your investigation?” Perhaps then the attorney would have said yes and Tressel would have been faced with a moral dilemma, but at least he would have a paper trail backing up his innocence.

Of course, we have now come to learn the identity of said attorney and it doesn’t help Tressel’s defense from last night. According to the Columbus Dispatch, the attorney who sent the emails to Tressel is Chris Cicero, a former Buckeye player who was on the team while Tressel was an assistant under former head coach Earle Bruce. This means that Tressel likely had some sort of relationship with Cicero, which explains the “buddy-buddy” tone of the emails and furthers the notion that Cicero sent the emails to Tressel as a heads up so he could cover it up before anyone else found out. This certainly wouldn’t be out of character for Cicero, who according to the Dispatch, has been in trouble multiple times previously, including having his law license suspended by the Ohio Supreme Court for a year in 1997.

Chris Cicero, the attorney who sent the "heads up" emails to Tressel (photo from Columbus Dispatch)

This does not bode well for Tressel or Ohio State. Not only did Tressel cover it up initially, but he lied about (or intentionally omitted disclosure of) the incident when NCAA investigators came asking in September and twice in December. When asked in December whether he had any prior knowledge of the tattoo parlor, Tressel said that he had received a tip, but it wasn’t specific. Yet, as the emails show, they were specific and certainly worthy of being brought to the attention of school compliance officials.

The school’s self-imposed two-game suspension and $250,000 fine will undoubtedly be raised by the NCAA and only goes to show the arrogance of Tressel, Athletic Director Gene Smith, and school president Gordon Gee. That they’re willing to concoct a story in front of a national television audience that they think will appease the NCAA and convince everyone that Tressel was really just a martyr shows that they believe they’re above reproach.

And why should they think any differently? Tressel and Ohio State have toed the line between right and wrong the past decade and gotten away with it with a couple of very minor slaps on the wrist.

In just his second season, Tressel ran into trouble with freshman Maurice Clarett, a key member of the 2002 National Championship team, who got in trouble for both academic and legal issues and was dismissed from the team. He claimed that had he told the truth to investigators, “half the team would have been suspended” so he just “took it,” and that he received preferential treatment, phantom jobs, money and favors. At the time, he was written off as a rogue player operating on his own and trying to get back at his former coach who “blackmailed” him.

Then, star quarterback Troy Smith was suspended a couple games for accepting $500 in return for nothing from Robert Q. Baker, a health care product provider, who also said that former OSU receiver Chris Gamble had “worked” for him as well. Interestingly enough, Baker played at Baldwin-Wallace while Tressel’s father was head coach there, so there was a prior relationship. Sound familiar? Neither the program or Tressel received any penalties.

A year later, star linebacker A.J. Hawk and lineman Nick Mangold’s apartment was robbed of $3,000 in cash, $1,425 in movies, a $500 Gucci watch, and more. You know, all the stuff that a normal college student has laying around. Nothing came of it after his dad said he had repeatedly warned Hawk not to keep his money in his apartment. Just like Cam Newton’s dad warned him to act as if he didn’t know he was shopped around.

This past fall, former NFL agent Josh Luchs described meeting with OSU receiver Santonio Holmes in 2005, but Holmes told him that he had already been receiving money from an agent the past couple years and his family had been taken care of.

Finally, since it’s still fresh in our minds, we remember “Tatgate” in December when Terrelle Pryor and several others were found to have sold championship rings, gold pants, and other gear to a tattoo parlor in exchange for tattoos. In addition, Pryor was pulled over driving loaner cars not once, not twice, but three times. Of course, all three were on the up-and-up while his car was getting worked on by this dealership that features autographed Ohio State memorabilia all over its walls.

Of all its transgressions the past decade, Ohio State got dinged the worst for the tattoo incident, with those players being forced to sit out the first five games of next season. AD Gene Smith tried to play it down as “an incident isolated to these young men and this particular instance,” but former Buckeye running back Antonio Pittman said players have been getting hookups on tattoos since 2001 (when Tressel took over).

Co-conspirators Smith and Gee say Tressel won't be fired (AP Photo/Terry Gilliam)

Each of these incidents when taken individually aren’t particularly damning. But when viewed together, with the addition of Tressel’s cover-up, they certainly suggest  a pattern, especially considering that OSU has self-reported a nation-leading 375 minor violations. It seems to suggest that their strategy is to self-report the small things so the NCAA will overlook the bigger things. Yet, even the small things when compiled together, should point to a larger problem.

A married man may be able to receive forgiveness from his wife once or twice for telling her that he mistakenly kissed another woman.** But when it keeps happening, sooner or later, she’s going to realize that he either keeps putting himself in those situations or is having an outright affair and is trying to cover it up by telling half-truths.

Likewise, a coach may occasionally realize he sent one too many texts to a recruit and need to self-report, but when it’s happening 35-plus times a year, you’re either covering up larger issues as an organization or you have incredibly poor compliance educators.

So what should we Michigan fans hope for? Is this a good thing for us?

I say it’s not a good thing, because while we may take some satisfaction about our smug rival’s downfall (finally), he has basically owned us since he took over from John Cooper. We have our own new regime with Brady Hoke committed to restoring Michigan football to its glory days and this provides us a perfect opportunity to recapture the rivalry. We want Tressel at the helm when that happens. We’ll probably never achieve a winning record against him since he’s already so far ahead and won’t stay coaching that long, but at least we could put a dent in it.

Secondly, we just went through an NCAA investigation of our own and are currently on probation for Rich Rodriguez’s violations. Yes, we all caught a lot of flak from our Buckeye brethren during that time, but we don’t have much room to talk.

Finally, even though they’re our arch rival, we want the Big Ten to remain strong and above the cheating reputation that the SEC has earned. It may be too late for that now, but if the NCAA drops the hammer on Ohio State, it could affect their program (and by default, the Big Ten) for years.

That being said, I think we can all agree to paraphrase Dennis Green and say that he is who we thought he was and we never have to listen to a self-righteous Ohio State fan wax poetic about their sweater-vested hero anymore.

It will be interesting to see the fallout from this in the coming months, but this is the last I’m saying about Tressel or Ohio State for the foreseeable future on this site. I now turn my attention back to Michigan !! Go Blue !!

__________________________________________________________________________________

*If you take a brush, dip it in laundry detergent, and write on a wall, it won’t show up in daylight, but if you turn off the lights and shine a blacklight on it, it will glow. Years ago, in college, we painted the NCAA Tournament bracket on the ceiling of our dorm room with detergent and updated it each night throughout the tournament. The RAs had no idea, but it created one of the coolest rooms on campus, and unless they’ve re-painted the ceilings, it’s probably still there. Just like the baggage Tressel left behind at Youngstown State when he took over at OSU.

**I’m not at all saying this is okay or condoning this. Just using it as an example.

Share this post