photo AnnArborGIFHeader_zps02670880.gif

New in Blue: 2015 defensive end Reuben Jones

January 25th, 2015 by Justin Potts


Reuben Jones(247 Sports)

Reuben Jones – LB | 6-3, 223 | Lakeland, Fla. – Lake Gibson
ESPN: 3-star, #58 DE, 78 rating Rivals: 3-star, #27 SDE 247: 3-star, #64 SDE Scout: 3-star, #145 DE
Other top offers: Nebraska, Michigan State, Iowa, Louisville, West Virginia, Cincinnati, Duke, Wake Forest

It took longer than many expected, but Jim Harbaugh received his first commitment on Saturday evening when three-star defensive end Reuben Jones committed to the Wolverines on his official visit. The Lakeland, Fla. native had previously committed to Nebraska on Nov. 15, but became unhappy with the coaching change in Lincoln and announced his decommitment from the Huskers prior to visiting Ann Arbor.

On Saturday, he tweeted his commitment to Harbaugh’s Wolverines.

Jones is a consensus three-star recruit among the four major recruiting sites. Rivals ranks him the highest as the 27th-best strong side defensive end in the class and 68th-best player in the state of Florida. ESPN ranks him the 58th-best defensive end and gives him a rating of 78. 247 Sports lists him as the 64th-best strong side defensive end and 187th-best player in Florida. Finally, Scout has him as the 145th-best defensive end.

ESPN, Scout, and 247 each list his height and weight as 6’3″, 223, but Rivals has him slightly bigger at 6’4″, 225. According to Hudl, he has a Nike Sparq-verified 40-yard time at 4.89.

During his high school career at Lake Gibson, Jones recorded 212 total tackles (95 solo), 28 tackles for loss, 27.5 sacks, five forced fumbles, and four fumble recoveries. In his junior and senior years combines, Jones tallied 158 of those tackles, 25 tackles for loss, and 18.5 of those sacks.

Aside from Nebraska, Jones held offers from Michigan State, Louisville, Iowa, West Virginia, and Kentucky, among others.

Jones became the seventh commitment in the 2015 class but the first defensive lineman. He joins athlete Brian Cole and quarterback Alex Malzone — both early enrollees — as well as kicker Andrew David, defensive back Tyree Kinnel, and offensive linemen Grant Newsome and Jon Runyan Jr in the class.

Michigan hoops preview: #6 Wisconsin

January 24th, 2015 by Justin Potts


UM-Wisconsin
Michigan (12-7, 5-2) vs #6 Wisconsin (17-2, 5-1)
Saturday, Jan. 24 | Ann Arbor, Mich. | 7:00 p.m. EST | ESPN
Offense
64.9 Points/gm 73.8
(425-1,033) 41.1 Field Goal % 48.9 (494-1,011)
(156-441) 35.4 3-pt FG % 35.8 (132-369)
(227-309) 73.5 Free Throw % 74.2 (282-380)
11.9 FT Made/gm 14.8
31.8 Reb/gm 34.4
12.4 Assists/gm 12.9
9.9 Turnovers/gm 7.8
Defense
61.6 Points/gm 54.6
(435-999) 43.5 Field Goal % 40.9 (399-976)
(125-362) 34.5 3-pt FG % 34.9 (90-258)
34.1 Opp. Reb/gm 27.6
6.1 Steals/gm 5.1
1.9 Blocks/gm 3.9
Individual Leaders
Caris LeVert (14.9)*, Zak Irvin (13.7) Points/gm Frank Kaminsky (16.9), Sam Dekker (12.6)
Caris LeVert (4.9)*, Derrick Walton Jr (4.7) Reb/gm Frank Kaminsky (8.2), Nigel Hayes (6.9)
*Out for season

___________________________________________________________________________________

Although Michigan’s postseason is hanging on by the thinnest of threads, the Wolverines stand just a half game out of first place in the Big Ten one-third of the way into conference play. Tonight, when Michigan hosts sixth-ranked Wisconsin in front of a nationally televised ESPN audience, it gets a prime opportunity to seize the quality win its resume lacks. Let’s take a look at the Badgers.

The Starters
Minutes Points FG% 3FG% FT% Reb Ast TO Blk Stl
Frank Kaminsky (F) 30.4 16.9 53.4 40.4 75.6 8.2 2.4 1.4 1.8 1.1
Sam Dekker (F) 27.4 12.6 52.7 35.6 69.0 4.9 1.2 1.2 0.5 0.3
Nigel Hayes (F) 31.4 12.5 55.3 36.8 69.6 6.9 1.9 0.9 0.6 0.7
Josh Gasser (G) 29.4 7.2 45.2 40.3 85.4 2.7 1.5 0.5 0.1 0.8
Bronson Koenig (G) 22.1 5.6 43.5 37.0 87.5 1.4 2.1 0.5 0.2 0.3
The Others
Minutes Points FG% 3FG% FT% Reb Ast TO Blk Stl
Traevon Jackson (G)* 27.4 9.4 45.6 28.6 85.4 1.7 2.9 1.6 0.2 1.1
Duje Dukan (F) 18.6 6.5 43.5 35.4 66.7 3.2 0.8 0.9 0.1 0.4
Vitto Brown (F) 8.8 2.8 48.8 00.0 58.8 2.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3
Zak Showalter (G) 7.3 2.7 40.7 14.3 85.7 1.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.4
Riley Dearring (G) 3.1 1.0 40.0 42.9 00.0 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.1
*Injured
The Schedule
Date Opponent Score
Nov. 14 Northern Kentucky W 62-31
Nov. 16 Chattanooga W 89-45
Nov. 19 Green Bay W 84-60
Nov. 22 Boise State W 78-54
Nov. 26 UAB* W 72-43
Nov. 27 Georgetown* W 68-65
Nov. 28 Oklahoma* W 69-56
Dec. 3 #4 Duke^ L 70-80
Dec. 6 at Marquette W 49-38
Dec. 10 at Milwaukee W 93-54
Dec. 13 Nicholls State W 83-43
Dec. 22 at California W 68-56
Dec. 28 Buffalo W 68-56
Dec. 31 Penn State W 89-72
Jan. 4 at Northwestern W 81-58
Jan. 7 Purdue W 62-55
Jan. 11 at Rutgers L 62-67
Jan. 15 Nebraska W 70-55
Jan. 20 #25 Iowa W 82-50
Jan. 24 at Michigan
Jan. 31 at #25 Iowa
Feb. 3 #23 Indiana
Feb. 7 Northwestern
Feb. 10 at Nebraska
Feb. 15 Illinois
Feb. 18 at Penn State
Feb. 21 Minnesota
Feb. 24 at #13 Maryland
Mar. 1 Michigan State
Mar. 5 at Minnesota
Mar. 8 at Ohio State
*Battle 4 Atlantis, ^ACC/Big Ten Challenge

Wisconsin began the season as the favorite to win the Big Ten and opened with seven straight wins, capturing the Battle 4 Atlantis crown before falling to Duke in the ACC/Big Ten Challenge. Another winning streak carried the Badgers into Big Ten play before Rutgers of all teams stopped the streak at eight just two weeks ago. But Wisconsin responded with a 15-point win over Nebraska and a 32-point thumping of 25th-ranked Iowa.

The Series

Michigan leads the all-time series 91-67 and 56-21 in Ann Arbor. Last season, the teams split their matchups, each winning on the road. Michigan beat Wisconsin 77-70 at the Kohl Center and Wisconsin returned the favor 75-62 in the Crisler Center. John Beilein is 2-12 all-time against Wisconsin.

Notes

• Senior guard Traevon Jackson broke his foot in a loss to Rutgers on Jan. 11 and will miss tonight’s game. He had started 84 consecutive games

• Wisconsin ranks fourth in the Big Ten in scoring (73.8 points per game) and first in scoring defense (54.6). The Badgers’ plus-19.2 scoring margin also leads the conference

• Wisconsin ranks second in the Big Ten in shooting percentage (48.9) and seventh in three-point shooting (35.8)

• Wisconsin ranks 12th in the Big Ten in three-point shooting defense (34.9 percent), ahead of only Northwestern and Purdue

• Senior Frank Kaminsky ranks fifth in the Big Ten in scoring (16.9 points per game), second in rebounding (8.2), fifth in blocked shots (1.8), and first in defensive rebounds per game (6.6)

• Sophomore Nigel Hayes ranks fifth in the Big Ten in rebounding (6.9 per game)

Recruiting Profile: 2015 CB Iman Marshall

January 23rd, 2015 by Alex Sibo


Iman Marshall
(247 Sports)

Previously: 2015 TE Chris Clark

Iman Marshall – CB | 6’2″, 190 | Long Beach, Calif. – Long Beach Poly
ESPN: 5-star, #1 CB, 92 grade Rivals: 5-star, #1 CB, #3 nat 247: 5-star, #1 CB, #5 nat Scout: 5-star, #1 CB
Other top offers: USC, Alabama, FSU, Oregon, LSU, UCLA, Auburn, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Miami, ND

One of the most talented and impressive physical specimens being recruited at the cornerback position this season, Long Beach Poly’s Iman Marshall looks to be Michigan’s number one quarry this winter. Marshall has yet to commit to any team thus far, but has either visited or has visits scheduled with Notre Dame, Florida State, LSU, Oregon, and Michigan, with USC also having mutual interest. Marshall sported the vaunted No. 2 jersey during his visit to Ann Arbor this past week, and could have a similar impact to Charles Woodson given the tools he would bring to Michigan if he does indeed commit to the Wolverines.

Athleticism

Athleticism - Iman MarshallMarshall has prodigious size as far as cornerbacks go, having a Nike verified height of 6’2″ (though listed at a shorter 6’1″ by many other outlets). While most defensive backs with 6-foot-plus frames don’t stick on the boundary as cornerbacks due to a lack of athleticism, there is no such concern with Marshall. The Long Beach native showcases very good range and downfield speed, and while he doesn’t have the most fluid of hips, he has flexible ankles and has good change of direction ability for a player of his size. Marshall might not light up stopwatches while running in shorts, but he carries his pads well on the field. Additionally, he has shown the athletic versatility to play as a receiver, with the ball in his hands, as outside corner, a nickel back, a deep safety, and as a kick returner.

Coverage

Coverage - Iman MarshallMarshall lined up most frequently in zone coverage as opposed to man coverage during his high school career at Long Beach, and seems best suited to zone going forward. Marshall has great length and demonstrated it often, frequently taking away passing windows and getting his hand in to break up would-be completions. His instincts and ability to read the play in front of him and the ball in the air are top-notch, which should translate into early playing time and success in college.

In terms of man coverage, Marshall lacks great change of direction and transition out of his backpedal, and could struggle to keep up vertically on an island versus the fastest and quickest receivers in college football. Marshall is not afraid to get physical in coverage, especially near the line of scrimmage, and has the length of a prototypical press corner. As a senior, Marshall was deployed as a single safety and charged with playing the center field which he manned capably.

Ball Skills

Ball Skills - Iman MarshallAs Marshall’s experience playing the wide receiver position at times throughout his career can attest to, he has very good ball skills, not only for the interception, but to catch passes on offense. Marshall doesn’t flash an outstanding catch radius or show off with eye-popping one-handers, but he has sure hands to pluck the football and the ability to put himself in position to do so. He adjusts well to passes thrown over his head and on his back shoulder. Marshall’s length and leaping ability are useful in competing for contested passes and high-pointing the football. When Marshall has the ball in his hands, he can be dangerous on interception and kick returns, showing shifty footwork and strength to ward off tackles.

Run Support

Run Support - Iman MarshallOne thing that can be infuriating while watching cornerbacks at any level of football is how noncommittal they can be towards playing the running game. This is certainly not the case with Marshall as he is an aggressive run defender who plays with strength and instincts. While Marshall could do a better job of getting off of blocks given his ability and the relative level of competition he faced, he pursues with great range and hustle. Marshall shows good tackling technique for a defensive back and wraps up while still delivering jarring hits on the football. With his combination of size and willingness versus the run, Marshall could convert to the safety position if needed by a coaching staff.

Bottom Line

Marshall may not possess blazing timed speed or the most explosive change of direction capabilities, but he stands out in every other category that is important to the cornerback position at the collegiate level. His great instincts will go a long way toward leveraging a role for himself on the football field and he possesses long-term potential to go pro within a few years. If Marshall does indeed sign with the Wolverines this winter, he could form one half of what could be a devastating duo at the cornerback position with last year’s five star recruit Jabrill Peppers. On the whole, Iman Marshall compares to former Virginia Tech and current Chicago Bears cornerback Kyle Fuller.

MG&B Grade (out of 10)
9.2 (5-star)

Following his visit to Michigan earlier this week, Marshall is visiting LSU this weekend and plans to wrap up his official visits with Oregon next weekend. Jim Harbaugh and staff plan to make an in-home visit to Marshall and his family — Marshall made the trip to Ann Arbor alone — before signing day on Feb. 4, but pulling him from hometown USC will be a tall order.

Stepping up: Michigan 54 – Rutgers 50

January 20th, 2015 by Sam Sedlecky


Walton vs Rutgers(Jim O’Connor, USA Today Sports)

It’s no secret that Michigan’s basketball team has struggled mightily this season after losing three players to the NBA and two big guys – one to graduation and a second to transfer – off a roster that made it to the Elite Eight last season. But it would have been hard for anyone to predict just how bad it would get.

After slogging through a non-conference schedule that saw home losses to the New Jersey Institute of Technology and Eastern Michigan, among a handful of other defeats, the Wolverines entered Big Ten season not looking to do much. Somehow, though, Michigan managed to stitch together a 3-2 record – albeit with two blowout road losses – heading into Saturday’s home showdown with Northwestern. Again, the struggles continued, but the young Wolverines managed to pull out an ugly and unencouraging two-point victory.

But one day later, the season that seemed to have already hit rock bottom fell further into the ground with the announcement that star junior wing Caris LeVert, who led Michigan in points, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, and minutes per game, would miss the remainder of the season with a broken foot suffered on the last play against Northwestern.

Fast-forward to tonight. Michigan would have to take to the road to face a team that defeated then-#4 Wisconsin two Saturdays ago and had given both Maryland and Minnesota good games on the road.

Michigan, clearly missing their star player, shoots 34.7 percent from the floor, 30.8 percent from downtown, and records 11 turnovers. Zak Irvin, Derrick Walton, and Spike Albrecht – what now must be considered the new “Big Three” – combined to make nine of 25 shots and just four of 15 triples while turning it over seven times. The Maize and Blue, as has become the norm this season, also suffered through nearly nine and a half minutes in the second half in which they could only manage one bucket, and five times went scoreless in three-minute periods.

And, oh yeah, at one point in the first half, Michigan’s lineup consisted of a sophomore walk-on who had played zero meaningful minutes to-date, another sophomore walk-on who was planning to redshirt so that he could eventually transfer to a smaller school for a fifth year and had not played a minute all season, a sparsely used freshman guard, another freshman who had lost his spot in the starting lineup due to increasingly poor play, and a third freshman who had fallen from first-game starter to third-string big man. Having trouble coming up with the names? That would be Sean Lonergan, Andrew Dakich, Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman, Kameron Chatman, and Mark Donnal, respectively.

As expected, Michigan got blown out by 30…won? Don’t ask me, I’m just as confused as anyone else.

But yes, you read that correctly – the Wolverines inexplicably pulled off a 54-50 road win at Rutgers despite a bevy of injuries, illnesses, and ineptitude to move to 5-2 in Big Ten play.

No Michigan player scored more than 12 points, but nine different Wolverines scored for just the sixth time all year and just the second time in conference play.

Michigan also managed to hold Rutgers to a putrid 35.8 percent mark from the floor and 29.4 percent from three.

The difference, however, might have been at the free throw line, where the Wolverines knocked down five more free throws (12) than Rutgers despite both having 14 total attempts. Derrick Walton, Jr. led the way there with a perfect 6-of-6 mark to ice the game away while finishing with a team-high 12 points.

Four Factors
Michigan Rutgers
42.9 eFG% 40.6
31.3 OReb% 35.1
19.2 TO% 19.2
28.6 FTR 26.4

It’s been a season of mostly downs for the Maize and Blue, and compounding the loss of the core of last year’s impressive team has been a rash of injuries and ailments. Both Walton and Albrecht have been suffering through lower body injuries throughout the majority of the season, LeVert is now done for the year with a broken foot (the same foot he broke last summer), Zak Irvin has been beat up in a couple games and is apparently ill, Albrecht missed Saturday’s game with an illness, and starting center Ricky Doyle once again could not go in the second half after looking completely worn out in just a couple minutes of play.

Rather than fold, though, Michigan has battled, and never more so than tonight. The Wolverines managed to hold onto a lead for the majority of the first half even with Zak Irvin glued to the bench with two fouls and a lineup that Tom Izzo would most certainly refer to as ‘weird’, and entered halftime up two behind five points and six rebounds from senior Max Bielfeldt and five points from freshman Aubrey Dawkins.

Irvin then came out of the break on a mission, netting five straight points in a minute and a half to put Michigan up four before Dawkins made a pretty driving layup and a free throw to give the Wolverines a seven-point lead – what would end up being the biggest of the evening.

Following the promising second half start came the all-too-familiar offensive drought for Michigan, however; after going up seven, the Wolverines scored exactly two points over the next 9:12 and suddenly found themselves down six to the equally listless Scarlet Knights.

I, though usually optimistic, simply could not envision a scenario in which Michigan could scrounge up enough offense to stage a comeback; in fact, I’ll even admit to doubting whether or not the visitors would score six points the rest of the way.

Yet within those final eight minutes, a light came on. Dawkins drained a huge three from the left wing to cut Rutgers’ lead in half before Derrick Walton and Spike Albrecht made back-to-back buckets – the first of the night for both – to tie it up at 42 with just under six minutes remaining.

After a couple more empty possessions on both ends, Walton knocked down his second triple in as many tries for Michigan and Bielfeldt unhesitatingly drained a trey of his own to mirror their earlier six-point deficit.

With three minutes left to make a final run, Rutgers had no chance of mustering up enough offense, and the Wolverines escaped.

Sure, the victory was far from pretty, and few problems appear to be truly solved, but John Beilein will certainly take a road win given the extreme circumstances. The win also marks the second time of Big Ten play in which Michigan has been able to take two of three games.

That’s a ratio that Beilein and squad would lovingly live with the rest of the way, but unfortunately the schedule is about to get a lot tougher.

Coming up this Saturday is a home tussle with Big Ten beasts Wisconsin that will feature as ESPN’s College GameDay contest. Another home game against lowly Nebraska closes out January before a brutal January consisting of at Michigan State, vs. Iowa, at Indiana, at Illinois, vs. Ohio State, vs. Michigan State, and at Maryland arrives.

For now, the Wolverines will enjoy the improbable victory, hope to heal up quickly, and focus on the Badgers. According to my friend and bracketologist Joe Cook, a win there would put Michigan near the bubble.

Perhaps it’s not what Michigan had planned on going into this season. But it’s certainly refreshing to see these Wolverines – no matter how young and battered they may be – continue to battle to stay alive.

Quick Hitters:

• One game after freshman Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman earned his first start in place of the ill Spike Albrecht on Saturday, classmate Aubrey Dawkins started his first career game tonight and made it count with 11 points on eight shots, three rebounds, and one block. Dawkins’s game continues to progress slowly after his coming out party against Illinois, and though he doesn’t do any one thing spectacularly yet, he’s shown enough to overtake the struggling Kam Chatman’s spot in the rotation. Dawkins’s shot looks good, his hops have propelled him to a couple nice rebounds, and his comfort level on both ends of the floor appears to be on the rise.

Perhaps the best play of the evening came on a terrific drive from Abdur-Rahkman midway through the second half in the middle of Michigan’s brutal scoring drought. The Philadelphia native was pressured all the way down the court and left to handle it on his own, nearly drew a 10-second violation, then blew by his defender without help and laid in a layup (something that hasn’t come easily to many Wolverines this season). Rahk also continues to earn more minutes, tallying four points in 14 minutes tonight.

 Ricky Doyle was clearly winded early on in the first half again as he continues to deal with an infection of some sort, but still managed three blocks in just seven minutes.

Three Stars:

***Derrick Walton Jr.***
12 points (2-of-8 FG, 2-of-7 3pt, 6-of-6 FT), seven rebounds, three assists, one steal, three turnovers in 30 minutes

**Aubrey Dawkins**
11 points (4-of-8 FG, 2-of-5 3pt, 1-of-2 FT), three rebounds (one offensive), one block in 31 minutes (career high)

*Max Bielfeldt*
8 points (2-of-7 FG, 1-of-3 3pt, 3-of-4 FT), eight rebounds (four offensive), one assist, one turnover in 22 minutes

Final Game Stats
# Name FG-FGA 3FG-3FGA FT-FTA OR DR TOT PF TP A TO BLK S MIN
21 Zak Irvin* 3-9 2-5 2-2 0 2 2 2 10 0 2 0 0 24
24 Aubrey Dawkins* 4-8 2-5 1-2 1 2 3 2 11 0 0 1 0 31
32 Ricky Doyle* 0-1 0-0 0-0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 7
02 Spike Albrecht* 1-4 0-3 0-0 0 2 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 32
10 Derrick Walton Jr* 2-8 2-7 6-6 0 7 7 0 12 3 3 0 1 30
03 Kameron Chatman 1-3 0-0 0-0 2 0 2 1 2 0 2 0 0 8
04 Andrew Dakich 0-0 0-0 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
12 M-A. Abdur-Rahkman 2-4 0-1 0-0 0 0 0 1 4 1 1 0 0 14
20 Sean Lonergan 1-1 0-0 0-0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 13
34 Mark Donnal 1-4 1-2 0-0 2 5 7 1 3 0 0 1 0 15
44 Max Bielfeldt 2-7 1-3 3-4 4 4 8 2 8 1 1 0 0 22
Totals 17-49 8-26 12-14 10 24 34 12 54 9 11 5 3 200
Rutgers 19-53 5-17 7-14 13 22 35 17 50 8 11 3 4 200
Full Stats

Michigan hoops preview: Rutgers

January 20th, 2015 by Justin Potts


UM-Rutgers
Michigan (11-7, 4-2) vs Rutgers (10-9, 2-4)
Tuesday, Jan. 20 | Piscataway, N.J. | 6:30 p.m. EST | Big Ten Network
Offense
65.5 Points/gm 60.2
(408-984) 41.5 Field Goal % 40.0 (408-1,021)
(148-415) 35.7 3-pt FG % 30.3 (124-400)
(215-295) 72.9 Free Throw % 67.8 (220-331)
11.9 FT Made/gm 12.4
31.7 Reb/gm 35.8
12.6 Assists/gm 10.6
9.8 Turnovers/gm 12.9
Defense
62.3 Points/gm 62.7
(416-946) 44.0 Field Goal % 40.2 (424-1,055)
(120-345) 34.8 3-pt FG % 31.0 (124-400)
34.0 Opp. Reb/gm 36.5
6.2 Steals/gm 5.7
1.7 Blocks/gm 4.4
Individual Leaders
Caris LeVert (14.9)*, Zak Irvin (13.9) Points/gm Myles Mack (14.7), Kadeem Jack (12.8)
Caris LeVert (4.9)*, Derrick Walton Jr (4.5) Reb/gm Junior Etou (7.1), Kadeem Jack (6.5)
*Out for season

___________________________________________________________________________________

Michigan’s 56-54 win over Northwestern on Saturday night was a costly one. The Wolverines lost their leading scorer, rebounder, assister, stealer, and shot blocker when Caris LeVert re-injured his foot on the final play of the game. The injury will require season-ending surgery, leaving an already hobbled Michigan squad looking for someone to step up. Rutgers is next on the docket, so let’s take a look at the Scarlet Knights.

The Starters
Minutes Points FG% 3FG% FT% Reb Ast TO Blk Stl
Myles Mack (G) 36.2 14.7 40.9 33.3 84.7 4.6 4.5 2.8 0.1 1.8
Kadeem Jack (F) 31.4 12.8 40.5 29.0 61.8 6.5 1.1 2.5 0.7 1.2
Bishop Daniels (G) 21.6 8.1 41.8 33.3 70.2 2.0 1.5 2.4 0.5 0.7
Junior Etou (F) 30.4 7.7 40.2 31.0 75.0 7.1 0.4 1.3 0.5 0.3
Greg Lewis (F/C) 25.0 5.4 47.8 00.0 64.3 4.8 0.8 1.5 1.3 0.8
The Others
Minutes Points FG% 3FG% FT% Reb Ast TO Blk Stl
Mike Williams (G) 24.3 7.3 34.4 23.1 80.0 2.1 1.2 0.7 0.7 0.8
D.J. Foreman (F) 13.9 2.7 43.8 40.0 28.0 2.1 0.5 0.9 0.2 0.1
Malick Kone (G/F) 11.7 2.0 31.0 22.2 50.0 1.8 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.3
Kerwin Okoro (G/F) 9.1 1.7 24.0 18.2 100.0 1.2 0.6 0.9 0.0 0.1
Shaquille Doorson (C) 9.6 1.6 51.9 00.0 25.0 2.2 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.0
The Schedule
Date Opponent Score
Nov. 16 George Washington L 53-70
Nov. 19 Fairleigh Dickinson W 61-44
Nov. 23 St. Francis (N.Y.) W 76-73
Nov. 25 Saint Peter’s L 50-68
Nov. 28 Vanderbilt* W 68-65
Nov. 29 #8 Virginia* L 26-45
Dec. 1 at Clemson^ W 69-64
Dec. 6 at Seton Hall L 54-81
Dec. 9 New Hampshire W 60-56
Dec. 14 Manhattan W 63-55
Dec. 20 St. Francis (PA) L 68-73
Dec. 23 Sacred Heart W 79-54
Dec. 28 at Monmouth W 59-58
Dec. 30 Northwestern L 47-51
Jan. 3 Penn State W 50-46
Jan. 8 at Nebraska L 49-65
Jan. 11 #4 Wisconsin W 67-62
Jan. 14 at #14 Maryland L 65-73
Jan. 17 at Minnesota L 80-89
Jan. 20 Michigan
Jan. 24 at Penn State
Jan. 27 Michigan State
Jan. 31 at #23 Indiana
Feb. 3 at Illinois
Feb. 8 Ohio State
Feb. 12 Purdue
Feb. 19 at #25 Iowa
Feb. 22 #23 Indiana
Feb. 26 at Purdue
Mar. 3 #13 Maryland
Mar. 7 at Michigan
*Barclays Center Classic, ^ACC/Big Ten Challenge

What an interesting case study Rutgers is this season. The Scarlet Knights have lost to two Saints — Peter’s and Francis — by an average of 11.5 points, they were held to just 26 points in an entire game against Virginia, but they handed fourth-ranked Wisconsin their second loss of the season. The other? Duke.

The Series

Michigan is 5-0 all-time against Rutgers, but the teams haven’t played since the 2004 NIT championship game which Michigan won 62-55. Michigan is 2-0 in Piscataway, having won 97-69 on Dec. 21, 1983 and 32-22 on Dec. 20, 1933. John Beilein is 4-2 against Rutgers during his career.

Notes

• Seven of Rutgers’ 10 wins have been decided by five or fewer points

• Rutgers is the lowest scoring team in the Big Ten, averaging just 60.2 points per game, and the only conference team with a negative scoring margin (minus-2.5)

• Rutgers is the third-worst free throw shooting team in the Big Ten (67.8 percent), the worst field goal shooting team (40.0 percent), and the worst three-point shooting team (30.3 percent)

• Rutgers ranks second to last in the Big Ten in turnover margin (minus-0.89)

• Kadeem Jack ranks second in the Big Ten in offensive rebounds per game (2.5)

• Junior Etou ranks tied for third in the Big Ten in defensive rebounds per game (5.6)

• Myles Mack ranks second in the Big Ten in minutes player per game (36.2)

Big Ten hoops power rankings: Week 4

January 20th, 2015 by Derick Hutchinson


Power Rankings_header
Conference newcomer Maryland has taken over the top spot in the rankings this week for the first time, supplanting Michigan State thanks to a 75-59 win over the Spartans. Iowa shot up four spots to the second spot, while Michigan, Illinois, Northwestern, and Penn State all held steady. This week, we get several top 25 matchups, beginning on Tuesday when 25th-ranked Iowa visits 6th-ranked Wisconsin and then on Thursday when 13th-ranked Maryland visits 23rd-ranked Indiana.

Previous: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3

1. Maryland (17-2, 5-1) – Up 2
Last Week: Beat Rutgers 73-65, Beat MSU 75-59 This Week: Thu at #23 Indiana, Sun vs Northwestern

Nobody saw this coming, but Maryland has taken Big Ten basketball by storm in 2015. The Terrapins just completed a season sweep of perennial power Michigan State and sit alone atop the conference standings.

2. Iowa (13-5, 4-1) – Up 4
Last Week: Beat Minnesota 77-75, Beat Ohio State 76-67 This Week: Tue at #6 Wisconsin, Sat at Purdue

Iowa delivered another punch in the gut to the Ohio State Buckeyes Saturday, riding a nine-point win to a season sweep of Thad Matta’s team. Iowa could really gain the early inside track with a win in Madison on Tuesday night.

3. Indiana (14-4, 4-1) – Up 1
Last Week: Beat Penn State 76-73, Beat Illinois 80-74 This Week: Thu vs #13 Maryland, Sun at Ohio State

Tom Crean’s Hoosiers are slowly putting together a solid resume after another 2-0 week moved them to within a half-game of the Big Ten lead. Nationally, Indiana climbed into the top 25 for the first time this season with No. 13 Maryland coming to town Thursday.

4. Wisconsin (16-2, 4-1) – Down 2
Last Week: Beat Nebraska 70-55 This Week: Tue vs #25 Iowa, Sat at Michigan

Wisconsin rebounded nicely from an unthinkable loss to Rutgers last Sunday by waxing Nebraska 70-55 at home. Now the Badgers face a meeting with Michigan in Ann Arbor sandwiched between two games against Iowa to end the month.

5. Michigan State (12-6, 3-2) – Down 4
Last Week: Lost to #14 Maryland 59-75 This Week: Wed vs Penn State, Sat at Nebraska

The Big Ten has little to hang its hat on after the top four teams, as the rest of the conference has struggled to show any signs of stability through the first third of the schedule. Michigan State is a perfect example of that, having lost five of their six games against quality opponents, with one good win in Iowa City.

6. Ohio State (14-5, 3-3) – Down 1
Last Week: Beat Michigan 71-52, Lost to Iowa 67-76 This Week: Thu at Northwestern, Sun vs #23 Indiana

Perhaps the only team with fewer quality wins than MSU is the Buckeyes, who’ve lost all five games against teams with a pulse. They’ll get another shot Sunday against a solid Indiana squad that beat OSU on Jan. 10.

7. Michigan (11-7, 4-2) – Even
Last Week: Lost to OSU 52-71, Beat Northwestern 56-54 This Week: Tue at Rutgers, Sat vs #6 Wisconsin

After being manhandled in Columbus on Jan. 13, Michigan returned home and eked out a last-second win over Northwestern Saturday. But the cost of the victory was steep as Caris LeVert, the team’s leader in scoring, rebounding, assisting, stealing, and blocking, went down for the season due to a foot injury suffered on the final defensive play.

8. Purdue (11-7, 3-2) – Up 3
Last Week: Beat Penn State 84-77 OT This Week: Wed at Illinois, Sat vs #25 Iowa

Purdue is staying afloat early in the conference season after pulling out a miracle overtime win in Happy Valley over the weekend. Now the road gets much tougher for the Boilermakers as they travel to Illinois before hosting nationally ranked Iowa and Indiana.

9. Nebraska (10-7, 2-3) – Down 1
Last Week: Lost to #7 Wisconsin 55-70 This Week: Tue vs Minnesota, Sat vs Michigan State

Nebraska’s modest two-game winning streak came to screeching halt in Madison as the Badgers manhandled Tim Miles’ team by 15 points. The Cornhuskers will need a scorching finish reminiscent of last year’s stretch run to return to the NCAA Tournament in 2015.

10. Illinois (12-7, 2-4) – Even
Last Week: Beat Northwestern 72-67, Lost to Indiana 74-80 This Week: Wed vs Purdue, Sat at Minnesota

A 2-4 Big Ten record doesn’t tell the whole story for Illinois, which has lost by 10 or less three times in six games. John Groce’s team is facing another disappointing conference season if it can’t find a way to win some of those toss-up contests.

11. Minnesota (12-7, 1-5) – Up 4
Last Week: Lost to Iowa 75-77, Beat Rutgers 89-80 This Week: Tue at Nebraska, Sat vs Illinois

After losing four of their first five conference games by a combined 13 points (and the other by 12 in Maryland), Minnesota finally got on the right side of a Big Ten matchup Saturday against Rutgers. Now five straight winnable games offer Richard Pitino’s team a chance to get back in the race.

12. Northwestern (10-8, 1-4) – Even
Last Week: Lost to Illinois 67-72, Lost to Michigan 54-56 This Week: Thu vs OSU, Sun at #13 Maryland

Last week was a heartbreaking one for Northwestern, as it dropped three straight games by single digits. The Wildcats had a chance to beat Michigan State in East Lansing before being blown out in overtime, then fell at home 72-67 to Illinois, and finally missed a wide open layup that would have forced OT in Ann Arbor. Next up: Ohio State and Maryland.

13. Rutgers (10-9, 2-4) – Down 4
Last Week: Lost to #14 Maryland 65-73, Lost to Min 80-89 This Week: Tue vs Michigan, Sat at Penn State

New Brunswick, New Jersey is still buzzing about last weekend’s upset win over Wisconsin. But in the meantime, the Scarlett Knights have dropped two straight Big Ten games. Rutgers will look to get back on track at home against Michigan on Tuesday evening.

14. Penn State (12-6, 0-5) – Even
Last Week: Lost to Indiana 73-76, Lost to Purdue 77-84 OT This Week: Wed at MSU, Sat vs Rutgers

After gifting away a win to Purdue Saturday, Penn State remained the only winless team in Big Ten play. The Nittany Lions failed to rebound a free throw with seconds remaining and allowed a game-tying long ball at the buzzer. Remember Penn State’s 12-1 nonconference start? Neither do they.

Discussing Michigan’s NCAA Tournament outlook with 131 Sports

January 19th, 2015 by Sam Sedlecky


Beilein vs Northwestern(Dustin Johnson, UMHoops)

My good friend and fellow college basketball junkie Joe Cook (@JLeeC33) from 131 Sports agreed to do a Q&A about Michigan’s challenging season to date. Joe’s specialty is in predicting the NCAA Tournament field, and he has done an outstanding job in doing that over the past few seasons, as seen below. Given this expertise, I asked Joe some questions about the Wolverines’ skimpy resume, what it will take for John Beilein’s squad to rally for a berth in the Big Dance, and the overall state of the Big Ten. [Note: This interview was conducted before it was announced that Caris LeVert would miss the remainder of the season.]

Joe, let’s start off with the basics. You don’t have the Wolverines even sniffing a Tournament berth right now (in your latest bracket, Michigan doesn’t even crack the next four out). Just how far out are they from the field of 68?

I think you captured my feelings perfectly when you said that I don’t have the Wolverines “even sniffing” a berth in the big dance right now. It’s hard to really quantify just how far out of the field the Wolverines are because of how flat and wide the topography of the tournament bubble is this year. I think the easiest way to answer this question is to say that they are one marquee win away from at least being on the radar; think home game against Wisconsin with ESPN College GameDay in town on the 24th of January.

For those of us who are hoping that your projections are way off and Michigan is much closer than that, can you give us an idea what your projection model is based off and just how your projections have stacked up to the likes of Joe Lunardi, Jerry Palm, and other so-called experts in the recent past – both in terms of correctly called teams and relation to actual seed line?

I’m an actuary by profession, so it’s really a part of my nature to try to find a way to numerically quantify any sort of sports analysis I perform; bracketology projections are no exception to this rule. Without revealing too much, I’ve developed a couple of minor algorithms using statistical regression that roughly project a team’s seed-line based on factors that the committee has used to seed teams in the past. In the seed projection process, I use this as a baseline measure, and adjust teams up or down based on my own personal “eye test”. As for how my projections stack up…

I’ll just say they stack up very well. You can see for yourself. The bracket matrix website aggregates the projections of all the bracketologists across the internet, and creates composite projections, while also ranking the bracketologists for accuracy. The blurb at the top of the aforementioned link explains the scoring and ranking process. Looking at the results, I have been the second most accurate bracketologist out of more than 100 over the past three years.

Obviously a lot has gone wrong with this Michigan team’s season so far, from a lack of quality to wins to some very bad losses, but if you had to pinpoint one thing holding the Wolverines’ resume back right now, what would it be?

It’s tough to really narrow it down to just one thing, but gun to my head, I would say it’s the lack of quality wins more than anything else. In general, I’ve noticed the committee is willing to overlook bad losses in the face of truly quality wins, because it demonstrates that a particular team has the potential to beat anybody. Michigan has played the likes of Villanova, Arizona, SMU, and Ohio State – four teams that are firmly in the tournament field. They’re 0-4 against these teams, with an average margin of defeat of more than 15 points per game.

What are the factors that you see contributing to these bad losses? Is there a player or two to blame? Is it bad coaching? Are injuries and/or inexperience taking a toll?

I would never say it’s bad coaching when Johnny B. is involved. In my one year as head coach of my former high school’s boys basketball junior varsity team (Yes, I played that card), I was (and still am) one of the firmest Beilein disciples you will find. I think you are on the right path in saying that injuries and inexperience are taking a toll on this team. It’s obvious to me that Walton’s toe injury is still plaguing him. His quick first step was one of his best weapons, and now that it has disappeared, he can’t generate as much space and respect from defenders as he needs to get off clean jumpers. Caris hasn’t taken on the lead “get me the ball and watch what I do with it” role quite like Nik did last season. The bigs are inexperienced and haven’t developed enough athletically to replace J-Mo and Horford.

As it stands today, what is Michigan’s best win and what is Michigan’s worst loss?

The best win has to be the early season W against the Orange, as that’s the only victory the Wolverines have over a team I currently have truly near the field. Frankly, that’s just grasping at straws, as Syracuse just lost a rather embarassing game at Clemson. I don’t think there is much of an argument from any fans of the team that the worst loss this season was the NJIT game.

Certainly the chances don’t look good for the Wolverines to storm their way into the NCAA Tournament, but is there at least a shot (outside of winning the conference tournament)? What is it going to take?

It’s going to take a miraculous finish that I currently don’t envision happening, but I think Michigan definitely still has a shot, albeit a long one, to make the tournament field. Even with the bad losses, I still think 19 wins is probably enough to allow Michigan to go dancing. That being said, I would worry if none or only one of those wins come against Wisconsin, Maryland, Ohio State, or Michigan State. As I mentioned above, quality wins tend to be a heavily-weighed factor in the committee’s mind when it comes to making a decision on a bubble team’s fate.

Last year, we saw just half of the Big Ten (six teams) go dancing, while the year before that saw a whopping eight (75 percent of teams) make it. In your latest projection, you have six Big Ten teams in the field (Wisconsin, Maryland, Michigan State, Ohio State, Indiana, Iowa). How many of those teams would you consider locks right now, how many Big Ten teams would you consider to likely make it, how many will be on the bubble, and how many will certainly be left out in the cold?

You can book it now: the Badgers, the Terps, the Spartans, and the Buckeyes will be in the tournament field in March. Some might question me putting the Spartans in this category, but I’ve seen enough from them to know that they’re going to have no problem getting to 20-plus wins. In fact, I see all these teams being on the 8-seed line or better when all is said and done. In all honesty, I don’t think I can put any teams in the “likely to make it” category, because I think the gap between these four and the rest of the league is distinct.

I’m going to skip to the locks to miss the tournament (i.e. the teams Michigan must win all remaining games against to have a chance to be dancing). Those teams include Nebraska, Northwestern, Rutgers, and Minnesota. That leaves the Big Ten teams that are squarely on the bubble, and it’s half of the conference! Indiana and Iowa currently sit relatively firmly in the field, but one bad loss could change that in the blink of an eye. The boys from Champaign are right in the thick of things, but if the tournament started today, I think they’d be watching from home – just barely. Then you have the other three bubble teams, who fall into the category by default only because I’m not ready to say they’re locks to be out. This is where Michigan sits, along with Purdue and Penn State.

Both you and I agree on many things, but one area of college basketball that we’d like to see altered slightly is the pace of play. I, for one, like a slower game compared to the NBA, but has college basketball gotten too slow for your tastes? How do you think the powers that be should go about changing it and do you think pace of play can predict success at all?

When I initially heard rumblings of men’s college basketball potentially moving from its current 35-second shot clock to a 30-second shot clock, similar to women’s college basketball, I was definitively opposed to the idea. However, the more editorials I read, the more statistics I analyzed, the more college basketball I watched, the more I started to believe that the 30-second shot clock is right for the game. The tempo of men’s college basketball has become sluggish, and possessions per game numbers have consistently decreased since the turn of the century.

I feel that the NCAA missed an opportunity in recent years by choosing to increase focus on guaranteeing space for the offensive player in possession, rather than focusing on speeding up the pace of play. This misguided decision has led to officials blowing the whistle more on ticky-tack fouls, and players going to the free throw line more frequently than they deserve.

Thanks so much to Joe for his time and expertise in answering these questions, and be sure to check out his blog at 131 Sports and follow him on Twitter (@JLeeC33). You can always tweet your questions to me (@SamSedlecky), email me at sedlecky@umich.edu, or leave a comment. If you enjoyed this piece, let us know!

Caris LeVert out for season

January 18th, 2015 by Justin Potts


LeVert vs Northwestern(Dustin Johsnon, UMHoops)

Junior guard Caris LeVert will miss the rest of the season with a foot injury suffered in the closing minute of Michigan’s 56-54 win over Northwestern on Saturday night, the program announced.

LeVert led Michigan in scoring (14.9 points per game), rebounding (4.9), assists (3.7), steals (1.7), and minutes (35.8) this season. He was the only player on a Power 5 team to lead his team in each of those categories and one of just six nationally.

“Caris has been working so hard this season and for this to happen is very unfortunate,” said U-M head coach John Beilein. “If we know anything about Caris, he will do everything it takes to not only get better, but to help his teammates during this time. He is a tremendous young man who I will really miss coaching the remainder of the season. However, I am optimistic he will have a complete recovery.”

The injured foot is the same one he had surgery on last May, and this injury will also require surgery and a 12-week rehab process.

“While this is obviously not what I wanted, I know this team will come together and be stronger because of it,” said LeVert. “Now more than ever, it is important for all of us support this team. For me, I am familiar with the recovery process and what work lies ahead for me. I am very confident that I will return 100 percent and have already begun work to ensure that happens.”

Entering this season, LeVert was regarded by many to be a sure-fire first round draft prospect if he chose to forego his senior season. The injury may cause his stock to drop if he opts to enter the draft this summer as teams typically don’t want to expend resources on an injured player. It will be interesting to see if that results in LeVert coming back for the 2015-16 season. At the same time, doing so would risk further injury. Regardless, we wish him a speedy recovery.

Rahk on: Michigan 56 – Northwestern 54

January 17th, 2015 by Justin Potts


MAAR vs Northwestern(Dustin Johnson, UMHoops)

On Muhammad Ali’s 73rd birthday, Michigan’s freshman guard who bears his name delivered the knockout blow to Northwestern. Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman, starting in place of Spike Albrecht who was out with a respiratory infection, recorded a career high nine points and five rebounds, but none was more important than his three-pointer in the final minute that served as the game-winning basket in Michigan’s 56-54 win over the Wildcats on Saturday night.

Michigan also started the game with a three, this one by Derrick Walton Jr, and jumped out to a 25-11 lead just over 10 minutes into the game. But the lead would be short-lived as Northwestern outscored Michigan 21-6 the rest of the half. Vic Law put the Wildcats on top with a jumper at the buzzer. Northwestern led 32-31.

Four Factors
Michigan Northwestern
42.2 eFG% 47.1
23.1 OReb% 28.6
5.3 TO% 20.5
19.0 FTR 11.5

The second half began the same way the first half ended as Northwestern scored seven of the first ten points and took a 39-34 lead. Max Bielfeldt hit a jumper and then a three to tie the game at 39 with 13:13 to play.

The rest of the game went back and forth, neither team able to pull away by more than four points. A Zak Irvin three — his only basket of the game — put Michigan ahead 53-49 with 3:48 left, but Michigan was held scoreless for the next two minutes and 51 seconds. A three by Scottie Lindsey cut the lead to one with just over a minute left, but Abdur-Rahkman hit the dagger, a three from the right wing. Alex Olah followed with a jumper, and after a Caris LeVert miss, Northwestern had one final chance to force overtime. But Bryant McIntosh missed a layup in the closing seconds and Michigan hung on for the win.

Michigan shot just 34.5 percent from the field and 39.1 percent from downtown and was out-rebounded 38-29. But the Wolverines made four more three-pointers and committed nine fewer turnovers than their counterparts. Michigan converted 12 Northwestern turnovers into 19 points.

LeVert led Michigan with 18 points on 7-of-19 shooting and also led the team with six rebounds and seven assists. But he left the arena on crutches with what John Beilein said after the game was likely a sprained ankle. Walton was the only other player in double figures with 14 points on 4-of-6 three-point shooting. Rahkman added nine and Irvin six. Olah led Northwestern with 22 points on 9-of-12 shooting.

Michigan makes its first trip to Piscataway, N.J. on Tuesday to face Big Ten newcomer Rutgers (10-9, 2-4) at 6:30 p.m. The game will be televised by Big Ten Network.

Final Game Stats
# Name FG-FGA 3FG-3FGA FT-FTA OR DR TOT PF TP A TO BLK S MIN
02 M-A. Abdur-Rahkman* 4-7 1-3 0-0 1 4 5 2 9 1 1 0 1 26
32 Ricky Doyle* 1-2 0-0 0-0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 10
10 Derrick Walton Jr* 4-11 4-6 2-2 0 5 5 2 14 0 0 0 3 40
21 Zak Irvin* 1-6 1-4 3-5 2 2 4 0 6 2 1 0 1 37
23 Caris LeVert* 7-19 2-4 2-3 0 6 6 1 18 7 1 1 0 38
03 Kameron Chatman 1-3 0-0 0-0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 9
12 M-A. Abdur-Rahkman 1-6 1-5 0-0 1 0 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 15
24 Aubrey Dawkins 0-2 0-2 0-0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10
34 Mark Donnal 0-2 0-1 0-1 1 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 11
44 Max Bielfeldt 2-6 1-3 0-0 2 0 2 1 5 0 0 1 1 19
Totals 20-58 9-23 7-11 9 20 29 11 56 10 3 2 6 200
Northwestern 22-52 5-20 5-6 8 30 38 16 54 12 12 2 1 200
Full Stats

Michigan hoops preview: Northwestern

January 17th, 2015 by Justin Potts


UM-Northwestern
Michigan (10-7, 3-2) vs Northwestern (10-7, 1-3)
Saturday, Jan. 17 | Ann Arbor, Mich. | 8:15 p.m. EST | Big Ten Network
Offense
66.1 Points/gm 65.2
(388-926) 41.9 Field Goal % 43.1 (395-916)
(139-392) 35.5 3-pt FG % 34.4 (115-334)
(208-284) 73.2 Free Throw % 72.9 (204-280)
12.2 FT Made/gm 12.0
31.8 Reb/gm 35.3
12.7 Assists/gm 14.6
10.2 Turnovers/gm 11.5
Defense
62.8 Points/gm 62.4
(394-894) 44.1 Field Goal % 41.3 (375-907)
(115-325) 35.4 3-pt FG % 35.9 (98-273)
33.8 Opp. Reb/gm 32.7
6.2 Steals/gm 3.2
1.7 Blocks/gm 4.0
Individual Leaders
Caris LeVert (14.8), Zak Irvin (14.4) Points/gm Bryant McIntosh (12.4), Tre Demps (12.2)
Caris LeVert (4.8), Derrick Walton Jr (4.5) Reb/gm Alex Olah (7.2), Vic Law (5.0)

___________________________________________________________________________________

After winning both games last week, Michigan got demolished by Ohio State in Columbus on Tuesday and is in danger of falling to .500 in conference play with a loss tonight. Northwestern comes to town with an identical 10-7 overall record, but the Wildcats have just one Big Ten win so far. Michigan is going to have to play itself into the NCAA Tournament at this point, which means games like this are must-wins the rest of the season. Let’s take a look at Northwestern.

The Starters
Minutes Points FG% 3FG% FT% Reb Ast TO Blk Stl
Bryant McIntosh 32.9 12.4 32.9 42.2 85.7 2.7 4.5 2.9 0.3 0.2
Tre Demps 31.9 12.2 38.7 28.7 64.1 3.6 2.6 1.2 0.1 0.4
Alex Olah 27.9 10.3 46.8 35.0 72.5 7.2 1.5 1.8 1.7 0.4
Vic Law 24.5 6.6 36.2 20.5 80.6 5.0 1.5 1.6 0.6 0.4
Sanjay Lumpkin 27.4 6.4 57.4 36.4 71.0 4.8 1.2 0.8 0.3 0.8
The Others
Minutes Points FG% 3FG% FT% Reb Ast TO Blk Stl
JerShon Cobb 21.9 5.8 35.9 31.6 68.8 2.8 1.5 1.0 0.1 0.3
Nathan Taphorn 9.2 4.3 59.1 52.0 66.7 4.4 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1
Scottie Lindsey 11.4 4.2 45.3 44.0 72.7 2.1 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.2
Dave Sobolewski 8.0 2.1 37.5 38.9 81.8 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.3
Gavin Skelly 8.4 1.9 50.0 00.0 54.5 2.4 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.3
The Schedule
Date Opponent Score
Nov. 14 Houston Baptist W 65-58
Nov. 17 at Brown W 69-56
Nov. 20 North Florida W 69-67
Nov. 22 Elon W 68-67 OT
Nov. 25 Miami (Ohio)* W 55-46
Nov. 26 Northern Illinois* L 42-61
Dec. 3 Georgia Tech^ L 58-66
Dec. 6 at #23 Butler L 56-65
Dec. 14 Missouri Valley State W 101-49
Dec. 17 Central Michigan L 67-80
Dec. 20 Western Michigan W 67-61
Dec. 22 UIC W 63-46
Dec. 27 Northern Kentucky W 76-55
Dec. 30 at Rutgers W 51-47
Jan. 4 #4 Wisconsin L 58-81
Jan. 11 at Michigan State L 77-84 OT
Jan. 14 Illinois L 67-72
Jan. 17 at Michigan
Jan. 22 Ohio State
Jan. 25 at #14 Maryland
Jan. 31 Purdue
Feb. 3 at Nebraska
Feb. 7 at #7 Wisconsin
Feb. 10 Michigan State
Feb. 15 Iowa
Feb. 18 at Minnesota
Feb. 21 Penn State
Feb. 25 Indiana
Feb. 28 at Illinois
Mar. 3 Michigan
Mar. 7 at Iowa
*Cancun Challenge, ^ACC-Big Ten Challenge

The only common opponent so far this season is Illinois. Michigan beat the Illini 73-65 in overtime to open Big Ten play, while Northwestern lost to their in-state rival 72-67 on Wednesday. The Wildcats don’t have a good win yet this season, having lost to the only ranked teams they have played, 23rd-ranked Butler, 65-56 on Dec. 6 and seventh-ranked Wisconsin 81-58 two weeks ago. They also lost their ACC/Big Ten Challenge matchup to Georgia Tech, 66-58.

The Series

Michigan leads the all-time series 108-56 and has won the last six matchups. Michigan also leads 62-20 in Ann Arbor. Last season, Michigan beat Northwestern 74-51 in the teams’ only meeting. The last time Northwestern beat the Wolverines was a 74-60 decision in Evanston on Jan. 18, 2011, and the last time Northwestern won at Crisler was on Jan. 10, 2010.

Notes

• Caris LeVert is the only player in a Power 5 conference (and one of six nationally) to lead his team in points, rebounds, assists, and blocks

• Northwestern is the second-lowest scoring team in the Big Ten, averaging 65.2 points per game. Michigan is the third-lowest.

• Northwestern ranks 11th in the Big Ten in field goal percentage (43.1 percent) and field goal percentage defense (41.3 percent)

• Northwestern ranks 9th in the Big Ten in three-point shooting (34.4 percent) and 13th in three-point shooting defense (30.8 percent)

• Northwestern ranks last in the Big Ten with just 55 steals (3.2 per game). The next closest team, Wisconsin, has 91 (5.1 per game). Michigan ranks 6th with 106 (6.2 per game)

• Northwestern ranks last in the Big Ten in turnover margin, averaging 0.94 more turnovers than their opponents per game

• Alex Olah ranks third in the Big Ten with 7.2 rebounds per game