Last week, we were all fairly close to predicting the final score, but Matt was the closest, predicting 38-24. The final score was 42-24 good guys. It was Matt’s first pick’em win of the year. He gets the honor of winning Prince’s Purple Rain album and a 2002 Northwestern media guide. Lucky him.

This time around, we have all kinds of ammo to play with, being a rivalry game and all. This week’s winner will receive a Little Bro outfit to give to his favorite State fan, as well as a Paul Bunyan children’s book to read to said Sparty to remind him of the trophy that will no longer reside in East Lansing after Saturday.

Beating Michigan State tomorrow would make Brady Hoke the first Michigan head coach to do so in his first season since Bennie Ooserbaan in 1948. It would also make Michigan 7-0 heading into its bye week and will likely get Michigan into the Top 10 when the BCS standings are released Sunday night. So who thinks Michigan can win?

The picks:

Justin (1): On paper, Michigan State looks like the team to beat in this one. Sparty boasts the nation’s top total defense, an experienced senior quarterback, and NFL-caliber playmakers on both sides of the ball. But games are never won on paper. State is as much a paper tiger as any team in the country.

The offenses that the Spartan defense has shut down this season rank 118, 21, 88, and 105 nationally. Youngstown State’s offense ranks 8th in the Football Championship Subdivision. That’s not exactly awe-inspiring. The one good offense Michigan State faced, Notre Dame (21st in total offense), beat them 31-13. True, the Irish gained a season-low in total yardage, but take away the 89-yard kickoff return touchdown and a Robert Blanton interception return that gave ND the ball at the MSU 12-yardline, and that offensive yardage is likely right up to where it usually is for the Irish.

In short, it’s nearly impossible to draw conclusions as to how good this Spartan defense actually is yet, until it can prove it can beat a team with a good offense.

Michigan is that team, averaging 38 points and 458 yards per game. It’s easy for one to look at Michigan from a distance and say, “Well, Michigan started hot the past two years but couldn’t hold up against Big Ten competition.” And that’s true. But comparing those two teams to this year’s team is like comparing apples to oranges. One makes apple sauce and one makes orange juice. They’re both good, but one is a breakfast staple and the other is reserved for middle school lunch boxes.

This year’s Michigan offense is the orange juice. It shares some similarities to the offense under Rich Rodriguez, but it’s much more complex, and that’s the way Brady Hoke wanted it when he took over. More than simply a zone-read, quick pass offense, it has elements of a power game, some trick plays, and a wide assortment of packages that we’re just starting to see. It has lots of pulp, some pulp, no pulp, fresh squeezed, even juice from concentrate. It’s a diverse offense that keeps breaking out new looks and is sure to have something new tomorrow.

This game marks the first time since Chad Henne in 2007 – the last time Michigan beat Sparty – that Michigan brings a second-year starting quarterback into the game. And that can’t be taken lightly. Though Denard Robinson is still prone to mistakes, it’s from fundamentals, not that he simply can’t make plays. He’s proven time and again that he can make big plays when needed. Ask Notre Dame or Northwestern.

Look for Borges to try to get Denard comfortable early on with some quick screens and designed runs to counter Jerel Worthy. You can be rest assured that Borges will have a gameplan to neutralize Worthy’s quick jump off the ball and take advantage of an aggressive front seven.

Defensively, Greg Mattison will install an effective blitz package to pressure Kirk Cousins early, forcing him into some mistakes.

The game will go back and forth and be tight until the clock hits zero, but I think the magic of Denard will shine brightly once again and will Michigan to victory.

Michigan 27 – Michigan State 23

Josh (2): Little Brother hasn’t given up more than seven points in a game this season, other than the beat down Notre Dame gave it. But, is hasn’t really played any “good” offenses. Everyone wants to talk about how Michigan hasn’t beaten anyone good either, but they’re beating teams they’re supposed to beat and doing it convincingly. That’s what good teams do.

Not to mention that Michigan is only giving up 12.5 points per game against better teams than through the first six games last year.

It seems like we say this every week: this is going to be the toughest test for Michigan thus far. First, it was Western Michigan’s Alex Carder. Then, ND’s Tommy Rees, and then Northwestern’s Dan Persa. Michigan gave up yards, but not a lot of points and last I checked, you win the game by scoring more points than you give up. It has nothing to do with the amount of yards. True, Michigan is giving up a lot less yards per game than last season’s first six, but the important thing to note is it’s giving up two touchdowns less per game, and that is huge.

Michigan State can put up some decent yardage through the air and Kirk Cousins is probably the best quarterback Michigan has faced so far. He isn’t going to pose the same threat as Persa did with his legs, but he is still a good quarterback. Give any good QB enough time and he will pick you apart. That is the key on defense: hurry Cousins into making quick, bad throws and make him move out of the pocket.

Michigan’s front four has improved each game and they know they need to get more pressure on the QB. If they can, then it could be a long day for Cousins.

Michigan State’s offensive line has been a bit suspect at times this year, and if that continues, Michigan should be able to get some good pressure on Cousins.

On the other side of the ball, Michigan absolutely has to limit its turnovers. Michigan will not win this game throwing three picks in the first half, like last week, putting itself in a deep hole.

State lost a couple of good defenders from last season, but is still a stout defense, giving up just 173 yards per game and ranked No. 1 in the FBS in total defense. Fortunately for Michigan, the Wolverines boast the No. 10 total offense in the land, racking up 457 yards per game.

Much like pundits want to look at who Michigan has put up those numbers against, we will look at who Michigan State has been stuffing yardage-wise: Youngstown State – an FCS school; Florida Atlantic – a winless school from the Sun Belt Conference; Central Michigan – no more needs to be said about them; and Ohio State – one of the most inept offenses in the country. Notre Dame did spank the Spartans but managed only 275 yards.

So four of the five teams State has played were vastly inferior or poor offenses. Not to take anything away from what they’ve done, but State has not faced anyone near as good as Denard and Co.

If Michigan wins this game, everyone will be drinking the Kool-Aid, and some already are. I’ve bought in completely to Hoke and Mattison, though I didn’t think it would pay dividends so quickly. This is not the same Michigan team as last year, and they’re proving it to everyone each and every week. After this week, people will stop flying their “fraud flags” and buy into what’s going on in A2.

Michigan will limit its turnovers and force a couple as it tents to do. The defense will keep Cousins in check and Borges opens the drawer some more and will confuse State’s defense on their way to seven in a row.

Michigan 35 – Michigan State 17

Matt (1): This is the first prediction where I have no idea what to say. I am truly worried about Michigan’s 6-0 undefeated streak. I would love to see Brady Hoke’s start at Michigan to improve to 7-0, but this one is going to be a tough one. Maybe the toughest yet.

Kirk Cousins is a good quarterback, but Denard has proven that although he may toss some picks, he’s a pretty good QB too. I dont see there being a shortage of points in this game. I just hope that if Michigan comes up a little short in the first half (which seems to be typical), that Hoke, Borges and Mattison can rally the troops like they have in many of our games.

I see Denard being Denard again: a few picks, a couple of TD tosses, and a few rushing TDs. Cousins will play a good game too.

I am going to go out on a limb and say the Wolverines pull this one out last minute, like they have a few times this season. A lot of TDs for both teams and this one goes to OT!

Michigan 49 – Michigan State 42 (2 OT)

Chris (2): This week’s game at Michigan State will be the toughest test yet for the Wolverines, especially for the Michigan offense. The strength of the MSU defense is a strong defensive front led by defensive tackle Jerel Worthy and end William Gholston. The linebackers are down a notch from last year after the loss of Greg Jones, who was drafted by the New York Giants, and the secondary has two starter returning from last year’s unit.

The numbers say that MSU has the third-best defensive unit in the nation, allowing an average of only 10.2 points per game. However, I think that number is a little low due to the schedule the Spartans have played thus far. This includes games against Youngstown State (of the Football Championship Subdivision), Florida Atlantic, Notre Dame, Central Michigan, and Ohio State. Taking out ND, who put up 31 points on MSU, the Spartans have not played a tough schedule.

So while I believe that this MSU defense is pretty good and can cause problems due to its aggressiveness, I don’t think it is as good as most people are saying.

On offense, Michigan State has a two-headed rushing combo with running backs Edwin Baker and Le’Veon Bell, as well as a standout receiver in B.J. Cunningham. Five games into the season, the MSU offense has performed average for the amount of talent it had returning at the skill positions, including those mentioned above and senior quarterback Kirk Cousins. This is especially true in the running game.

This is a tough game to make a prediction for. MSU hasn’t played any great teams and the best team it played so far, Notre Dame, beat the Spartans badly. The same can be said for Michigan, however, although the Wolverines did beat Notre Dame at home.

Both teams have questions on defense as to how good they really are. I think both teams have offenses that can put up high scores against an opponent.

It will be interesting to see how Michigan Defensive Coordinator Greg Mattison handles star wide receiver Cunningham with a secondary that is still young and struggles at times. He’s probably the best in the Big Ten.

Since his first day as head coach at the University of Michigan, Brady Hoke has re-focused the program on the big rivalries, MUS and Ohio State, and I expect that Michigan will come into this game extremely motivated after three straight losses to the Spartans.

On the other side, MSU Defensive Coordinator Pat Narduzzi held Denard Robinson and the Michigan offense in check last year, so he knows how to defend against this offense. With that being said, I have to give the edge to Michigan in this game.

Both teams will come in excited to play, but I like a more experienced Michigan offense against Narduzzi’s defense. As long as offensive coordinator Al Borges can settle Denard down early in the game by calling plays, which allow him to stay in his comfort zone, Michigan will be fine. But Michigan cannot get down early because then, Denard will be forced to pass and MSU will know it’s coming. This will not lead to success or a win.

I expect both teams to put up points and I think this game will come down to who can run the ball bet and which team can protect the ball from turnovers.

Michigan 28 – Michigan State 24

We’re halfway through the season and continue to have new weekly winners. This time it’s Hazel Parker who finally cracked the winner’s circle in convincing fashion. His deviation of 108 was 18 better than a three-way tie for second place between KleinoRhino, TrueBlue88, and Maize and Go Blue.

The question that won it for Hazel Parker was Michigan’s total yardage. He predicted 528, just 13 yards short of Michigan’s total of 541. The next closest on that question was newcomer KleinoRhino, who was 39 away. Fellow newcomer tooty_pops was the only contestant to correctly pick Northwestern receiver Jeremy Ebert’s receiving yards.

Three contestants, jtcho78, bomoho, and goobot, correctly predicted the amount of fourth quarter points, 28.

For his win, Hazel Parker gets a t-shirt from The M Den. Click here for last week’s results and here for the overall standings.

This week, Michigan travels to East Lansing for a reunion with Little Brother. Michigan State features the nation’s third-best scoring defense, allowing just 10.2 points per game, and top-ranked total defense, but its offense ranks 62nd averaging 28 points per game. The Spartans haven’t faced an offense like Michigan’s yet.

Here are this week’s questions:

In a season that was supposed to be a battle just to make the NIT, Michigan basketball has performed well above expectations, having played itself to the cusp of an at-large bid for the NCAA Tournament. One game stands in the way of that goal and it couldn’t write itself any better than this.

In football, the season ends with the annual battle with Ohio State. More times than not (although not as of late), it comes down to that game to decide the Big Ten champion, which team goes to the Rose Bowl, or at the very least, which team gets the better bowl game.

But in basketball, Michigan State serves as Michigan’s biggest rival and the past decade and a half has been pretty one-sided. Saturday presents an opportunity to change all that; an opportunity few thought possible five months ago.

Both teams enter Crisler Arena in need of a win to finish in the top half of the Big Ten standings, earn a first round bye in next week’s Big Ten Tournament, and put itself in prime position for an at-large bid in the NCAA.

For Michigan, the past decade and a half has been filled with strife and heartache since the Ed Martin scandal rocked the program in the late 1990s. The once proud and strong program that produced the Fab 5 and won the National Championship in 1989 has been through three coaches and just two tournament appearances since Steve Fisher was fired in ’97 (one since 1998).

A Tale of Two Programs
	Since 1997
244-202	Record	348-130
54.7	Winning %	72.8
6	Head to Head Wins	18
10	Avg. Winning Margin	17
0	Big Ten Titles	6
2	NCAA Tournaments	14
0	Final Fours	6
0	National Championships	1
*Includes this season’s previous meeting

Coincidentally, that was also the last time Michigan swept Michigan State and the point in which the Spartans began their rise to become the prominent team in the state.

Since then, MSU has been to the NCAA Tournament every season, reached the Final Four six times, and won the championship in 2000, while Michigan’s lone appearance was two seasons ago.

On Saturday, Michigan has a chance to not only sweep its hated rival for the first time since ’97, but possibly keep the Spartans out of the Big Dance for the first time since that year and take a big step towards reclaiming the state.

Head Coach John Beilein has seemingly resurrected the program that showed signs of potential during the Tommy Amaker years, but never realized that potential. Beilein came in with a different coaching and recruiting mentality – one based on recruiting high character kids that fit his system – and has Michigan playing well above its head and talent level.

He’s always managed to get the best out of his players, and with a team chalk full of underclassmen and no seniors, Beilein finally has an emerging star at point guard and a coveted number two scorer in the duo of Darius Morris and Tim Hardaway Jr. He also has a pair of Top-100 players coming in next season in Carlton Brundidge and Trey Burke, so the program is on its way up.

But the first step in that process is beating Michigan State tomorrow. In the season’s first meeting, Michigan outlasted the Spartans in East Lansing, 61-57. Zack Novak led the way with 19 points, while Morris had 17, but it was Stu Douglass who was the biggest hero, hitting with a three-pointer with 22 seconds left to seal the win. Michigan hit 10 threes in the game, shot 50 percent from the field, tied the Spartans in rebounds and committed one more turnover (13) than MSU.

A win would most likely give Michigan the fifth seed in the Big Ten Tournament and a second round matchup with Illinois, which hosts last-place Indiana on Saturday. Most importantly, a win would put Michigan at 19-12, 9-9 in the Big Ten (tied for fourth) and almost assure the Wolverines an at-large bid in the Big Dance. A loss would probably pit Michigan against Iowa in the first round of the BTT and Michigan would have to win that one and one or two more to even have a shot.

It has been a long time since Michigan basketball has had a game this meaningful, and tomorrow’s game will certainly have Crisler rocking. Following Michigan State’s win over Iowa on Wednesday, Head Coach Tom Izzo declared, “We’re gonna find a way to win Saturday and get you back to where you belong: in the NCAA Tournament.” It’s not much of a guarantee, but the Maize Out on Saturday will act as if he guaranteed he would never lose to Michigan again, and make him eat his words.

As for me, I’m going to find a way to keep my wife, who is nine months pregnant, from going into labor tonight so I can be where I belong: watching a Michigan victory over Little Brother. Go Blue!

As the 130th season of Michigan football comes to an end, it’s time to reflect on what we saw and look forward to next year and beyond.

2009 yielded some highlights and some lowlights, some controversy and some challenged loyalty. A legend was made and some buds blossomed. Records fell, both good and bad, and a system started to show some promise.

No one knew what to expect from this year’s version of Michigan football in Rich Rodriguez’s second year at the helm.

The overly optimistic among us predicted a breakout season of nine or ten wins.

Realistic optimists pointed to Rodriguez’s penchant for second-year turnarounds and predicted a record of 7-5 or maybe, if luck goes the way of the maize and blue, 8-4.

Realists pointed to the true freshmen quarterbacks and lack of overall talent on the squad and predicted a 5-7 or 6-6 finish.

As it turns out, the realists were right, but the realistic optimists weren’t too far off.

The fact of the matter is, Michigan fans were so shell-shocked from the worst record in 46 years in 2008 that we were looking anywhere we could for hope.

We ignored comments that Rodriguez made in the preseason such as, “There’s still going to be some transition. We’re going to play a lot more freshmen and redshirt freshmen than we would like to.”

We thought, sure there will be a lot of freshmen playing, but Tate Forcier and Denard Robinson are surely better options than Steven Threet and Nick Sheridan. Or, yeah, but it can’t get any worse than last season.

In this space, I offered some words of caution: “Coming off a season that resulted in the most losses in school history, and pinning all hopes on a true freshman quarterback, this seems to be the window of opportunity before Rodriguez’s system begins to take hold and terrorize the Big Ten.”

But then I followed it up with an overly ambitious response: “However, I think we’re going to see a very fast, well-conditioned and much-improved Michigan team playing with a chip on its shoulder to avoid being put to rest again.”

While that may have held true for a while, reality eventually sunk in that this team was indeed loaded with youth and razor-thin on the depth chart.

What began in August as optimism and eagerness to forget the epic disaster of 2008, quickly turned to scorn as the Detroit Free Press brought into question allegations of NCAA infractions on the part of Rodriguez and his coaching staff.

The opening game against Western Michigan couldn’t come soon enough. We cursed Michael Rosenberg and Mark Snyder for the timing of their article and the witch-hunt that ensued and we promised to get revenge on Justin Boren, who transferred to Ohio State, for his comments that seemed to be the centerpiece of that article.

And then the season began and practice time was forgotten and the story of Shoelace became one we would hear every game the entire season (as my wife would roll her eyes every time the announcers felt compelled to tell the story of why Denard Robinson doesn’t tie his shoes…every…single…game).

Robinson thrilled us with a 43-yard touchdown run, Tate Forcier showed promise in his first game by throwing for three touchdowns, Junior Hemingway caught nearly half his season total in receiving yards (103) and all of his touchdowns (two), and the defense shut down what many thought would be a high-powered offense.

We saw a show of solidarity for Rodriguez, Michigan won easily, and the season started off with a bang.

The came Notre Dame, fresh off of throttling Nevada, and riding preseason BCS bowl (or national championship game) predictions.

This will go down as the game that raised all of our expectations, mostly because no one knew at that time how mediocre Notre Dame really was.

It appeared to be Rodriguez’s signature win, as Michigan matched Notre Dame score-for-score and Forcier stunned the 18th-ranked Irish with 11 seconds left.

Forcier looked as veteran and composed as ND junior quarterback Jimmy Clausen, completing 23-of-33 for 240 yards and three touchdowns (one rushing). It’s hard to imagine that that would be the high point of his season, in just his second collegiate game.

Of course, there was the Armando Allen out-of-bounds play, which, despite the evidence , Notre Dame fans will carry to their graves in contempt.

The win over Notre Dame vaulted Michigan into the Top 25 heading into week three against Eastern Michigan. Former Michigan defensive coordinator Ron English brought his Eagles to Ann Arbor and didn’t provide much of a test.

Michigan showed off its running game this time, going for 380 yards on the ground, and getting 163 yards and two touchdowns on just eight carries from Carlos Brown in the first half alone.

Robinson scored two more touchdowns to enhance the unrealistic expectations for a guy that arrived on campus less than two months earlier.

Michigan then opened the Big Ten slate with Indiana in what would eventually be the battle for last place. At the time, though, Michigan was hoping to get to 4-0 heading into its intrastate rivalry battle in East Lansing.

This game provided our first glimpse of what the rest of the season would hold, as Michigan struggled to beat the Hoosiers, needing a 26-yard touchdown pass from Forcier to Martavious Odoms with 2:29 remaining to get the win.

The Indiana victory prompted me to draw a comparison to the New York Jets, who like Michigan, started off hot with a rookie quarterback: “Following Sunday’s Jets-Titans game, Vic Carucci of NFL.com asked Jets safety Kerry Rhodes if he thought the Jets’ style of play was sustainable. Rhodes replied that he thought it was because having such a good defense allows rookie quarterback Mark Sanchez to make some mistakes.

“Unfortunately, that won’t exactly translate to Michigan. While I think Michigan’s offense is further along in its development than Sanchez’s Jets offense, relatively speaking, Michigan hasn’t faced its toughest opponents yet.”

I provided the last part of that quote because I knew we were in for a tough go the rest of the season. I didn’t know, however, that that would be our last win over a FBS team all season. Ironically, Michigan’s fall has mirrored the Jets’ collapse.

At 4-0, a return to a bowl game looked assured, and Michigan entered “Little Brother” week seeking to avenge last season’s 35-21 loss to Michigan State.

It was the first road game of Forcier’s career and we saw the fist true test of the season, as the Michigan offense was shut down much of the game. But Forcier continued his early-season magic, leading a 14-point comeback to force overtime with a touchdown completion to Roy Roundtree with just two seconds left.

In overtime, Forcier was intercepted on a tipped pass that never should have been thrown, and Michigan dropped its second in a row to Michigan State for the first time since 1967.

Michigan Streaks Broken in 2009
First back-to-back losses to Michigan State since 1967
First home loss to Penn State since 1996
First home loss to Purdue in last 17 meetings
First back-to-back losing seasons since 1963-62

This began a run of snapping streaks right and left.

With its first loss of the season under its belt, Michigan traveled to Iowa for a prime-time night game against the nation’s 12th-ranked Hawkeyes.

Brandon Minor had his breakout game of the season, scoring two touchdowns against a defense that hadn’t given up a rushing touchdown in 33 quarters.

The game started out as well as one could ask, as Donovan Warren picked off the first pass of the game and returned it for a touchdown.

Michigan hung around until a muffed punt (hello 2008!) gave Iowa the ball at the Michigan 16. Iowa punched it in and took a 30-21 lead.

Robinson led the offense down the field for a touchdown to narrow the gap, but on the next possession, threw an interception to end the game, beginning the Wolverine-faithful’s love-hate relationship with Denard.

Despite a second-straight loss, Michigan fans were encouraged that the team was able to hang with undefeated Iowa until the last minute of the game, and a return to the Big House to face an FCS school was just what Michigan needed to regroup.

Michigan was able to set numerous school records in the win over Delaware State that week and give many starters a week off.

Five Wolverines scored their first career touchdowns and Robinson was able to get a lot of work at quarterback.

Michigan fans even got the treat of seeing Nick Sheridan on the field without the game on the line.

Many fans didn’t like the idea of playing an FCS school, but following the game, I proclaimed, “I have no problem with Michigan playing Delaware State this year. With a roster comprised of mostly underclassmen, and a complete overhaul in progress, playing an FCS opponent was better than a bye week in my opinion.

Michigan Records Set vs. Delaware State
727 total yards of offense
442 yards in the first half
28 points in the first quarter (ties record)
57 point margin of victory (most since 58-0 win over Indiana on Oct. 14, 2000)
461 rushing yards (most since 480 vs. Iowa on Oct. 3, 1992)
49 first half points (most since 55 vs. Chicago on Oct. 21, 1939)

“I would love to see Michigan start scheduling another tough out-of-conference game every year, but at this point in the development of Rich Rodriguez’s scheme, it’s not time for that just yet.

“Once the team grows up and the spread-n-shred is fully ingrained, I hope the schedule will be strengthened. But when you have Florida, arguably the nation’s top team and reigning national champion, playing Charleston Southern, Troy and Florida International, one must look that way first before pointing fingers at the baby Wolverines.”

I still believe it was okay to play Delaware State this season, but obviously with the way Michigan finished the season the benefits weren’t as great as I thought.

At 5-2, Michigan looked primed to make a bowl game, needing just one more win in its final five games.

Penn State came to town and dominated Michigan, racking up 396 yards of offense, and handing Michigan its first true beating of the season.

For really the first time all season, Forcier looked like a true freshman, completing just 13-of-30 passes for 140 yards. The offense couldn’t get anything going in the cold, rainy conditions.

Michigan wasn’t expected to win this one, and despite the 25-point whooping, I considered this result somewhat of a fluke and still didn’t believe the team was as bad as the final record would eventually indicate.

Following the Penn State game, doomsday headlines abounded, and I cautioned fans not to listen to them.

As it turns out, they were right.

Michigan traveled to Champaign, Ill. for a match-up with 1-6 Illinois, a game that looked like a sure-win.

This one will forever be remembered as the epic collapse, and probably the turning point of the whole season. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a bigger turnaround before.

Michigan was firmly in control with a 13-7 lead and first and goal at the Illinois one-yard line in the third quarter. After stuffing Michigan on four straight rushes, Illinois took possession and seized the game.

Six plays later, a 70-yard touchdown run put Illinois ahead 14-13 and Illinois never looked back, out-scoring Michigan 24-0 the rest of the way.

At this point in the season, confidence in a bowl game turned into hoping to squeeze out a win in one of the final three games. The best hope was the following week against Purdue.

Perhaps hope is the wrong word against Purdue, as Boilermaker head coach Danny Hope carried a grudge into the game, blaming Rodriguez for getting one of his players suspended for a game earlier in the season – nevermind that the player deserved to be suspended just as much as Michigan linebacker Jonas Mouton did the week before that.

This game was much like the Illinois game, where Michigan was in control and let it get away. Michigan led 24-10 at halftime and pushed it to 30-17 in the third, but a 91-yard touchdown drive, an on-side kick, and a 54-yard touchdown pass later, and Michigan found itself trailing 31-30.

Michigan missed a 43-yard field goal and failed to convert a two-point conversion attempt that would have tied the game, and Michigan fell by two.

Michigan traveled to Wisconsin for its final road game of the season, still needing a win to become bowl-eligible.

This game followed the mold of the past couple, as Michigan hung around through three quarters, but faded down the stretch.

Forcier bounced back from some poor outings to complete 20-of-26 passes for 188 yards and two touchdowns, but it was the defense that couldn’t hold up against a powerful Wisconsin running game.

Although Michigan knew Wisconsin was going to run it in the second half, it still couldn’t stop the Badgers.

The bowl hopes all came down to the final week of the season against Ohio State, as Michigan looked to end its five game losing streak to the Buckeyes.

Though many around the nation talked of the lack of luster in the rivalry, the game still had plenty of storylines with Michigan needing a win to make a bowl and avoid a second straight losing season, Ohio State needing a win to capture the Big Ten title outright, and Justin Boren playing against his former team in the Big House.

The Michigan defense played inspired and turned in its best performance of the season, holding the Ohio State offense to just 14 points.

However, it was the youth of Michigan’s offensive leader that doomed the Wolverines’ chances of playing through the holidays.

Forcier turned the ball over five times, including a fumble in the end zone on Michigan’s first possession, which Ohio State recovered for a touchdown.

Michigan moved the ball most of the day against an Ohio State defense that ranks as one of the best in the nation. But it was unable to capitalize on trips to the red zone, turning the ball over too many times.

So as Michigan’s season came to an abrupt end for the second year in a row, many want to know where do we go from here?

Indeed, there are many questions that need to be answered, but I’m in the minority who still believes the program is on the right track.

Stay tuned for part two where I will look at the future of the football program, both short-term and long-term, as well as the recruiting class Michigan has coming in and who is still out there that Rodriguez needs to land.

In anticipation of Saturday’s in-state rivalry between Michigan and Michigan State, I went head-to-head with Michigan State writer Joe Guarr. Each of us presents the keys to winning the game for our particular side and predicts who will win. Check out his article here.

For the first 23-odd years of my life, my younger brother was, well, my little brother. I remember fondly taking him out on the driveway and beating up on him in one-on-one (though he’ll probably deny it ever happened). I also remember one Christmas when we were much younger and got pajamas. I got Batman, while he was stuck with Robin.

But then he grew up – literally. The scrawny teenager gave way to the bulky college kid and then the rugged Marine (pictured right). And now, while he’s fighting to defend my freedom in Afghanistan, I can honestly say that I look up to him.

Many around the country, especially those in East Lansing, Mich., expected a similar situation to happen this year.

Former Michigan running back Mike Hart pinned the term “Little Brother” on rival Michigan State, following Michigan’s come-from-behind win in 2007.

“Sometimes you get your little brother excited when you’re playing basketball and you let him get the lead,” Hart said. “Then you come back and take it from him.”

Michigan State players, coaches and fans took offense to it, while Michigan fans played it up and took pride in the fact that the maize and blue have won nearly 70 percent of the all-time meetings.

Last season, however, Michigan State came to Ann Arbor set for revenge and won 35-21. Prior to this season, Michigan State looked primed to take control of the rivalry and make a serious run at a Big Ten title, while Michigan seemed to be in turmoil, fresh off a 3-9 season and allegations of NCAA violations.

And then the season began.

Michigan soared out of the gates with the Big Ten’s best scoring offense, while Michigan State stumbled to a 1-3 record that included a home loss to Central Michigan.

By merely comparing records, one would deduct that Michigan should win this one quite easily. But, as in all rivalry games, the record doesn’t mean much when toe meets leather.

The players certainly don’t need anyone to tell them they can’t win. Just ask Michigan State defensive end Trevor Anderson.

“Before the game last year, Coach D [Mark Dantonio] told us that if you haven’t played Michigan, within 30 seconds you’ll realize why we don’t like them,” Anderson said. “After about 15 seconds, I realized why I didn’t like them. Just the total lack of respect that they have for our school in general. Not just the program, but the general lack of respect they have for us.”

Now, I don’t have a problem with what Anderson said. After all, respect is earned, and when you’ve only won 29 of the 101 all-time meetings, you haven’t earned it.

So what does Michigan have to do to avoid losing back-to-back games to Michigan State for the first time since the 1966-67 season?

Here are three keys for Michigan:

1. Keep Tate Forcier healthy

Forcier could be the most important player in this game for either team. The cool and confident freshman has played well beyond his years at times when it mattered most.

He’s had his freshman moments, but he out-dueled Notre Dame junior quarterback Jimmy Clausen in the final minutes and overcame a sprained shoulder to lead Michigan on not one, but two fourth-quarter comebacks last week against Indiana.

But how healthy is that shoulder? And what happens if he can’t go?

“I fully expect Forcier to be ready to go and do everything,” said head coach Rich Rodriguez on Wednesday.

Is that just hyperbole, or has Forcier’s shoulder significantly improved since this?

I think it’s safe to say Forcier will at least give it a go, but he better play smart. You can bet Michigan State defenders will have that shoulder in mind when given the opportunity to hit him. One hard hit or one bad fall and the reigns of the offense would fall to Denard Robinson.

Robinson has shown incredible quickness and elusiveness in running for three touchdowns. He hasn’t, however, shown he can lead the offense for an entire game.

Against Indiana, Robinson pioneered a seven-play, 65-yard touchdown drive in the second quarter. The biggest play was a 36-yard pass to tight end Kevin Koger on 3rd-and-8.

I love Robinson as a change-of-pace quarterback to compliment Forcier. But I’m not yet sold on his ability to quarterback an entire game yet.

So the biggest key to Michigan’s success is keeping Forcier in the game.

2. Score early

As I mentioned in my piece on how Michigan beat Indiana, Michigan has shown a propensity of getting off to fast starts.

Michigan has scored 52 first quarter points through four games and given up just 20.

In three of the four games, Michigan scored on its fist possession (two touchdowns and a field goal). In the fourth, against Notre Dame, Michigan scored a touchdown on its second possession, and followed it up with a kickoff return for a touchdown the next time it touched the ball.

A fast start is important in this game for two reasons:

First of all, to get the Michigan State crowd out of the game. This is Forcier’s first road test of his career, and while he’s done an admirable job of running the offense to this point, he hasn’t had to do it with a stadium full of rabid fans yelling at him.

Spartan Stadium will be electric on Saturday because for those in green and white, this is the biggest game of the season. This is the game that gets the blood boiling more than any other. Saturday is a chance to avenge a poor start and re-claim another piece bit of older brother’s birthright.

If Forcier can march down the field and score on the first possession or at least put up a couple of scores in the first quarter, it could mean a much quieter crowd than if he gets sacked a few times or knocked out of the game.

Which brings me to the second reason a fast start is critical: to build a lead in case Forcier isn’t able to play the entire game.

Michigan State leads the Big Ten in passing offense, and with three talented receivers in Blair White, Mark Dell and B.J. Cunningham, it can put up points.

Michigan’s secondary, outside of junior Donovan Warren, has been suspect so far this season, giving up an average of 243.8 passing yards per game. Notre Dame, a comparable passing offense, torched the secondary for 336 yards and three touchdowns in Week 2.

I’m not confident that a Denard Robinson-led offense can keep up, especially if it doesn’t already have a lead.

Robinson has established he can run, but he hasn’t shown that he can make the big throw when needed, or lead the team down the field in the final minutes like Forcier can.

If Forcier gets knocked out of the game, whether by Michigan State or not, Robinson needs to have a lead and Michigan needs to be able to pound the running game and work the clock.

3. Get solid play from the offensive line

Last week, against Indiana, Michigan surrendered about 70 yards on poor snaps from guard-turned-center David Moosman. The fifth-year senior moved from right guard to center when David Molk broke his foot against Eastern Michigan.
One of those, early in the third quarter, took Michigan out of field goal range, forcing a punt. Fortunately, those mistakes didn’t cost Michigan against Indiana, but you can’t keep giving away points and expect to win.

The offensive line has given up just six sacks so far through four games, though it’s hard to compare sacks against a spread-option offense to those against a drop-back passing offense.

Still, the line has done a pretty good job of protecting Forcier, and has paved the way for the nation’s seventh-ranked rushing offense, averaging 240.3 yards per game.

Expect Michigan State to bring a lot of pressure to try to rattle Forcier and knock him out of the game. It’s up to the offensive line to give him time to throw and lanes to run through.

Michigan State features probably the top linebacker in the Big Ten, in Greg Jones. Jones was picked as the Big Ten Preseason Defensive Player of the Year, and has lived up to the hype, leading the conference in tackles (52) and tackles per game (13).

The line, as well as backs Brandon Minor and Carlos Brown will have to be ready to pick up the blitz of Jones and junior Eric Gordon. Look for some big plays by the slot receivers and tight end Kevin Koger.

Prediction:

Michigan State will be ready to go and eager to atone for its early disappointment. Michigan might even make State feel disrespected less than 15 seconds into the game this time, although seconds have a way of standing still in East Lansing, so who really knows how long it will take?

All kidding aside, this should be a good old-fashioned shoot-out, just like Michigan’s games against Notre Dame and Indiana.

Prior to the season, I predicted Michigan would lose this one, but after seeing the two teams play four games apiece, Michigan has the hot hand, while State returns home with its tail between its legs.

Yet, the game is in East Lansing, after all…a place where Michigan is just 4-4 since 1993 (though Michigan has won the last three).

However, cold and rainy weather is expected in East Lansing on Saturday, which should favor Michigan’s running game.

I foresee Michigan reclaiming the Paul Bunyan Trophy by pulling out a close one. Minor and Brown combine for a pair of touchdowns and 150-175 yards, Koger and Junior Hemingway catch TD passes from Forcier, and Robinson runs for a score.

Michigan wins 35-31.